期刊文献+

行政复议中引入调解机制探析 被引量:1

On the Introduction of the Administrative Reconsideration to the Mediation Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《中华人民共和国行政复议法实施条例》围绕提高行政复议的质量和效率进行了一系列的制度创新,在立法上首次确立了行政复议调解机制。这一机制的建立,进一步弥补了我国《行政复议法》相关工作制度的不足,对于化解行政争议、保障公民合法权益、实现社会公正、促进依法行政有着十分重要的意义。 The Implementation Regulations Regarding the Law of Administrative Reconsideration of PRC introduced the administrative reconsideration to the mediation system in the legislation for the first time, which has carried on a series of system innovations to improve the quality and the efficiency of the administrative reconsideration. The establishment of the administrative reconsideration meditation mechanism has further made up the insufficiency of the relative work routines of The Law of Administrative Reconsideration, which is also very significant in solving the administrative disputes, safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the citizens, realizing social justice and promoting legal administration.
作者 王秀伟
出处 《长春师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2009年第2期25-28,共4页 Journal of Changchun Teachers Coliege
关键词 行政复议 调解 意义 范围 原则 the administrative reconsideration mediation significance scope principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1[美]史蒂文·苏本 玛格瑞特·伍 蔡彦敏 徐卉译.《美国民事诉讼的真谛》[M].法律出版社,2002年版.31页.
  • 2U.S. Code, vol.28, sec. 651(a).
  • 3Thomas F. Gibbons,ADR Use by Government Agencies, Alternative Dispute Resolution Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education,Published in cooperation with the Center for Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems, August, 2001.
  • 4Gelhom,Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution in Government: A Sense of Perspective, 1 Administrative Law Journal, pp. 459 - 460(1987).
  • 5Willard, Uses for Alternative Dispute Resolution: Better Ways to Resolve Some Public Sector Controversies, 1 Administrative Law Journal, pp. 479 - 493 (1987).
  • 65. U. S. C. A 571-583.
  • 7Thomas F. Gibbons, ADR Use by Government Agencies, Alternative Dispute Resolution Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education, Published in cooperation with the Center for Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems, August,2001.
  • 85 U. S. C. A. 554(c).
  • 9NLRB v. Oehoa Fertilizer Corp. , 368 U. S. 318, 322(1961).
  • 10United States v. Hooker Chemicals and Plastics Corp. , 540 F. Supp. 1067, 1072.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部