期刊文献+

错误加工的神经机制 被引量:23

The Neural Mechanisms of Error Processing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 错误加工在认知控制和行为监控中起着关键的作用。监控自己的认知和行为结果,觉察到应该的反应和实际的反应之间的差别(即错误),纠正这种错误并防止再犯是错误加工的主要内容。错误反应或由代表反应错误等负性反馈刺激诱发的ERP相对于正确反应或由代表反应正确等正性反馈刺激诱发的ERP,表现出一个相对负走向的波形变化,称为错误相关负波(error-related negativity,ERN)和反馈相关负波(feedback-related negativity,FRN),两者都定位于前扣回附近。错误加工神经机制的研究主要集中于前扣回与ERN、错误意识与错误加工、ERN与FRN的关系。对于前扣带回和ERN的功能意义的解释主要有错误检测理论、冲突监控理论、强化学习理论和预期违反假说。目前错误加工神经机制的研究在研究内容、研究方法和理论观点等方面还存在些问题,这些可能是未来进一步的研究方向。 The concept of error processing plays a central role in theories of cognitive control and performance monitoring.Effective behavior requires flexible and continuous performance monitoring.Identification and correction of differences between an intended an executed response(i.e., an error) are the main contents of the error processing.The research of the error-processing focused on the anterior cingulate cortex and the error-related negativity(ERN), a component of the event-related brain potential elicited when human participants commit errors or receives feedback indicating that they just made an erroneous response.There are four theories that account for the functional significance of ERN and ACC, such as error detection theory, reinforcement learning theory, conflict monitor theory, expectancy-deviation hypothesis.Despite in-depth insights provided by previous studies into our understanding of error processing, there are still some important questions to be answered, which might be the direction of future studies.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期341-348,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 西南大学国家重点学科"基础心理学"资助项目(西国重NSKD06002)。
关键词 错误加工 神经机制 前扣带回 错误相关负波 error processing neural mechanisms anterior cingulate cortex error-related negativity(ERN) feedback-related negativity(FRN)
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1孙世月,罗跃嘉.欺骗任务中结果评价的FN效应[J].心理学报,2008,40(6):693-700. 被引量:7
  • 2Bemstein, P. S., Scheffers, M. K., & Coles, M. G. H. (1995). Where Did I Go Wrong - a Psychophysiologieal Analysis of Error-Detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1312-1322.
  • 3Botvinick, M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
  • 4Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M, Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulated eortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749.
  • 5Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D.(1998) Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749.
  • 6Coles, M. G. H., Schcffers, M. K., & Holroyd, C. B. (2001). Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of errorprocessing. Biological Psychology, 56, 191-206.
  • 7Compton, C. R., Carp, J., Chaddock, L, Fineman, S. L., Quandt, L. C., & Ratliff, J. B (2007). Anxiety and error monitoring: Increased error sensitivity or altered expectations? Brain and Cognition, 64, 247-256.
  • 8Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M. Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K., (2005). Trial-by trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11730-11737.
  • 9Ehlis, A. C., Herrmann, M. L, Bernhard, A., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2005). Monitoring of internal and external error signals. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19(4), 263-269.
  • 10Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1990) Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. In C.H.M. Brunia, A.W.K. GaiUard, & A. Kok (Eds.) Psychophysiological brain research (pp. 192-195). The Netherlands, Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

二级参考文献30

  • 1Miltner W H R, Braun C H, Coles M G H. Event - related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time - estimation task evidence for a ‘generic' neural system for error - detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1997, 9(6): 788 - 798
  • 2Gehring W J, Willoughby A R. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 2002, 295 (5563): 2279 - 2282
  • 3Nieuwenhuis S, Holroyd C B, Mol N, et al. Reinforcement - related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2004, 28(4): 441 -448
  • 4Yeung N, Sanfey A G. Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 2004, 24 (28): 6258 - 6264
  • 5Holroyd C B, Larsen J T, Cohen J D. Context dependence of the event - related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology, 2004(41): 245 -253
  • 6Toyomaki A, Murohashi H. The ERPs to feedback indicating monetary loss and gain on the game of modified "rock - paper - scissors". International Congess Series, 2005, 1278:381 -384
  • 7Nienwenhuis S, Slagter H A, von Gensau N J A, et al. Knowing good from bad: differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2005, 21(11): 3161 -3168
  • 8Hajcak G, Holroyd C B, Moser J S, el; al. Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology, 2005, 42(2): 161 - 170
  • 9Hajcak G, Moser J S, Holroyd C B, et al. The feedback - related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology, 2006, 71 (2): 148 - 154
  • 10Holroyd C B, Coles M G H. The neuro basis of human error processing:. Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the errorrelated negativity. Psychological Review, 2002, 109(4): 679 - 709

共引文献6

同被引文献438

引证文献23

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部