期刊文献+

去个性化效应的社会认同模型 被引量:30

An Introduction to Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 去个性化效应的社会认同模型(Social identity model of deindividuation effects,SIDE)是从去个性化理论发展而来,它挑战了去个性化是一定条件下个体失去自我而做出反规则、反社会行为的观点。SIDE从认知维度和策略维度对去个性化现象作了新的解释。新近研究为SIDE提供了证据,也在认同行为表达、网络交流等方面对理论进行了拓展和应用。SIDE的提出在一定程度上更适合现代社会心理学对群体影响和群体行为的研究,同时也需要在更加广泛的文化背景中进一步验证和完善。 Social identity model of deindividuation effects(SIDE) originates from the deindividuation theory.It challenges the past view that deindividuation is the result of loss of self, which brings about the expression of antinormative or antisocial behaviors.SIDE provides new explanations to the deindividuation phenomenon in both cognitive and strategic dimensions.Research has been done to show evidence which supports SIDE and to apply it in terms of identity performance and computer-mediated communication.SIDE is more relevant to the contemporary research on group influence and group behavior in social psychology.However, more research is needed for further validation and consummation.
作者 兰玉娟 佐斌
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期467-472,共6页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划项目(05JAXLX009) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-06-0675)资助。
关键词 SIDE 去个性化 匿名性 社会认同 社会分类 SIDE deindividuation anonymity social identity self-categorization
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1古斯塔夫·黎朋.(1960).群众.见周晓虹(编).现代社会心理学名著菁华.pp.17-21.北京:社会科学文献出版社.
  • 2李春,宫秀丽.自我分类理论概述[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,51(3):157-160. 被引量:42
  • 3张莹瑞,佐斌.社会认同理论及其发展[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):475-480. 被引量:657
  • 4Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can't always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906.
  • 5Beaman, A., Klentz, B., Diener, E., & Svanum, S. (1979). Self-awareness and transgression in children: Two field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1835-1846.
  • 6Brown, R. (2000). Social Identity Theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 745-778.
  • 7Christopherson, K. (2007), The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Interact social interactions: "On the internet,nobody knows you're a dog". Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 3038-3056.
  • 8Coffey, B., & Woolworth, S. (2004). Destroy the scum, and then neuter their families: The web forum as a vehicle for community discourse? The Social Science Journal, 41, 1-14.
  • 9Diener, E. (1976). Effects of prior destructive behavior, anonymity, and group presence on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(5), 497-507.
  • 10Diener, E. (1977). Deindividuation: Causes and consequences. Social Behavior and Personality, 5(1), 143-155.

二级参考文献37

  • 1方文.群体符号边界如何形成?——以北京基督新教群体为例[J].社会学研究,2005(1):25-59. 被引量:116
  • 2杨宜音.“社会认同的理论与经验研究”工作坊召开研讨会[J].社会学研究,2005(4):240-242. 被引量:17
  • 3赵志裕,温静,谭俭邦.社会认同的基本心理历程——香港回归中国的研究范例[J].社会学研究,2005(5):202-227. 被引量:211
  • 4[1]Tajfel,H.Social categorization.In S.Moscovici (Ed.),Introductionàla psychologie sociale 1972.1.Paris:Larousse.
  • 5[2]Tajfel,H.,& Turner,J.C.An integrative theory of intergroup conflict.In W.G.Austin & S.Worchel (Eds.),The social psychology of intergroup relations 1979.Monterey,CA:Brooks/Cole.
  • 6[3]Tajfel,H.).Differentiation between social groups:Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations.European Monographs in Social Psychology,1978,14.London:Academic Press.
  • 7[5]Turner,J.C.,Hogg,M.A.,Oakes,P.J.,Reicher,S.D.,&Wetherell,M.Rediscovering the social group:A self-categorization theory.Ox-ford,UK:Blackwell,1987.
  • 8[6]Campbell,D.T.Common fate,similarity,and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities.Behavioral Science,1958,(3).
  • 9[7]Hamilton,D.L.,& Sherman,S.J.Perceiving persons and groups.Psychological Review,1996.
  • 10[8]Brmer,J.S.On perceptual readiness.Psychological Review,1957.

共引文献686

同被引文献403

引证文献30

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部