期刊文献+

Performance Comparison of IP-Networked Storage 被引量:1

Performance Comparison of IP-Networked Storage
原文传递
导出
摘要 Dramatically increasing amounts of digital data are placing huge requirements on storage systems.IP-networked storage systems, such as the network file system (NFS)-based network-attached storage (NAS) systems and the iSCSl-storage area network (SAN) systems, have become increasingly common in today's local area network (LAN) environments. The emergence of new storage techniques, such as object-based storage (OBS) and content aware storage (CAS), significantly improves the functionality of storage devices to meet further needs for storage sub-systems. However, these may impact system performance. This papercompares the performance of NFS, iSCSI storage, object-based storage devices (OSDs), and CAS-based storage systems in an environment with no data sharing across host machines. A gigabit ethernet network is used as the storage network. Test results demonstrate that the performances of these systems are compa- rable with CAS being much better than the others for write operations. The performance bottlenecks in these systems are analyzed to provide insight into how future storage systems may be improved and possible optimization methods. The analysis shows how the I/O interfaces in these systems affect the application performance and that network-based storage systems require optimized I/O latency and reduced network and buffer processing in the servers. Dramatically increasing amounts of digital data are placing huge requirements on storage systems.IP-networked storage systems, such as the network file system (NFS)-based network-attached storage (NAS) systems and the iSCSl-storage area network (SAN) systems, have become increasingly common in today's local area network (LAN) environments. The emergence of new storage techniques, such as object-based storage (OBS) and content aware storage (CAS), significantly improves the functionality of storage devices to meet further needs for storage sub-systems. However, these may impact system performance. This papercompares the performance of NFS, iSCSI storage, object-based storage devices (OSDs), and CAS-based storage systems in an environment with no data sharing across host machines. A gigabit ethernet network is used as the storage network. Test results demonstrate that the performances of these systems are compa- rable with CAS being much better than the others for write operations. The performance bottlenecks in these systems are analyzed to provide insight into how future storage systems may be improved and possible optimization methods. The analysis shows how the I/O interfaces in these systems affect the application performance and that network-based storage systems require optimized I/O latency and reduced network and buffer processing in the servers.
出处 《Tsinghua Science and Technology》 SCIE EI CAS 2009年第1期29-40,共12页 清华大学学报(自然科学版(英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 60273006) the Basic Research Foundation of Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology(TNList)
关键词 storage technique CAS area network performance comparison IP-networked storage storage technique CAS area network performance comparison IP-networked storage
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Gantz J F,,Reinsel D,Chute C, et al.The expanding digital universe: A forecast of worldwide information growth through 2010[].An Internet Data Center (IDC) White Paper.2007
  • 2IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force).iSCSI, version 08. IP storage (IPS)[].Internet draft Document: draft-ietf-ips- iscsi-txt.2001
  • 3Cakeljic Z.Content aware storage[]..2005
  • 4Rompay B V,,Preneel B,Vandewalle J.On the security of dedicated hash functions[].Proceedings of the th Symposium on Information Theory.1998
  • 5Performance comparison of iSCSI and NFS IP storage protocols. http:// www.technomagesinc.com/papers/ip-paper.html . 2003
  • 6Xinidis D,Bilas A,Flouris M D.Performance evaluation of commodity iSCSI-based storage systems[].Proceed- ings of the nd IEEE/th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST’).2005
  • 7Radkov P,Yin L,Goyal P, et al.A performance comparison of NFS and iSCSI for IP-networked storage[].Proceed- ings of the USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST).2004
  • 8Du D,He D S,Hong C J, et al.Experiences building an object-based storage system based on the OSD T-10 stan- dard[].DTC Research Report.2006
  • 9Liu P C,Hong S K,Hsu Y.Security enhancement and performance evaluation of an object-based storage system[].Lecture Notes in Computer Science.2007
  • 10Rhea S,Eaton P,Geels D, et al.Pond: The OceanStore prototype[].Proceedings of the Second USENIX Con- ference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST ).2003

同被引文献11

  • 1郭劲,李栋,张继征,贾惠波.iSCSI,CIFS,NFS协议的性能评测[J].小型微型计算机系统,2006,27(5):833-836. 被引量:5
  • 2RFC 2616[S], "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -HTTP/1.1" .
  • 3RFC 3530[S], "NFS Version 4 Protocol Specification".
  • 4RFC 3720[S], "Internet Small Computer Systems Interface ( Iscsi ) " .
  • 5RFC 3721[S], "Internet Small Computer Systems Interface ( iSCSI ) Naming and Discovery" .
  • 6H3C.iSCSI技术白皮书[EB/OL].Available:http://www.docin.com/p-6534624.html.
  • 7Andy Watson, Paul Benn, Alan G. Yoder. Multiprotocol Data Acess: NFS, CIFS and HTTP [R]. Technical Report of Sun Network Appliance, 2005.
  • 8Peter Radkov, Li Yin, Pawan Goyal, Prasenjit Sarkar, Prashant Shenoy. A Performance Comparison of NFS and iSCSI for IPNetworked Storage[C]//In Proceedings of the 3rd USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies. USENIX Association, 2004.
  • 9TRAEGER, A. and E. ZADOK. A Nine Year Study of File System and Storage Benchmarking[J], ACM Transactions on Storage, 2008.
  • 10Rdokov, P., An Experimental Comparison of Block- and File-Access Protocols for IP-Networked Storage[C]//Proceedings of the Usenix Conference on File and Storage Technologies, 2004.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部