期刊文献+

催乳素免疫测定法和钩状效应 被引量:2

Prolactin immunometric assays and hook effect
原文传递
导出
摘要 血清催乳素(PRL)免疫测定法存在高剂量钩状效应,主要是由于较高浓度的抗原饱和抗体,阻止抗体-抗原-抗体夹心复合物的形成,产生假性低值。临床上已报道许多侵袭性巨催乳素瘤的病例因PRL钩状效应而被误诊,中年男性多见,稀释前PRL水平呈轻、中度升高,主要表现为垂体占位效应,手术或放射治疗效果不佳。多巴胺受体激动剂能使PRL水平下降,使肿瘤缩小。可通过血清稀释后测定PRL或采用其他不存在钩状效应的测定方法等避免假性低值和错误治疗。 Serum prolactin (PRL) immunometric assays have the pitfall of high dose hook effect. A very high concentration of antigen saturates the antibodies and prevents the formation of the "sandwich complexes" ,which results in falsely low values. Many cases of invasive macroprolactinoma have been misdiagnosed because of PRL hook effect. Most patients were middle age men,with moderately elevated PRL levels before dilution and pituitary compression effect. Surgical procedures or irradiation have no effect, but dopamine agonists can normalize serum prolactin levels and reduce tumor size in most patients. Measurements of PRL in diluted serum samples or using an assay with a proven lack of hook effect may avoid falsely low estimation and management errors.
作者 王妹 胡仁明
出处 《国际内分泌代谢杂志》 2009年第2期95-96,100,共3页 International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30670999)
关键词 催乳素 钩状效应 催乳素瘤 免疫测定法 Prolactin Hook effect Prolactinoma Immunometric assay
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Casanueva FF, Molitch ME, Schlechte JA, et al. Guidelines of the pituitary society for the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol,2006,65 : 265-273.
  • 2Pereira O, Bevan JS. Preoperative assessment for pituitary surgery. Pituitary,2008,11:347-351.
  • 3Jeske W. The main reasons behind variability in detection of prolactin and causes of true or apparent discordance with clinical state. Endokrynol Pol,2008 ,59 :30-32.
  • 4Schofl C, Schofl-Siegert B, Karstens JH, et al. Falsely low serum prolactin in two cases of invasive macroprolactinoma. Pituitary, 2002,5:261-265.
  • 5Chahal J, Schlechte J. Hyperprolactinemia. Pituitary, 2008,11 : 141-146.
  • 6Comtois R, Robert F, Hardy J. Immunoradiornetric assays may miss high prolactin levels. Ann Intern Med, 1993,119 : 173-173.
  • 7Delgrange E, de Hertogh R, Vankrieken L, et al. Potential hook effect in prolactin assay in patients with giant prolactinoma. Clin Endoerinol, 1996,45:506-507.
  • 8St-Jean E ,Blain F,Comtois R. High prolactin levels may be missed by immunoradiometric assay in patients with macroprolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol ( Oxf), 1996,44:305-309.
  • 9Barkan AL, Chandler WF. Giant pituitary prolactinoma with falsely low serum prolactin:the pitfall of the " high-dose hook effect " : case report. Neurosurgery,1998 ,42 :913.
  • 10Petakov MS, Damjanovic SS, Nikolic-Durovic MM, et al. Pituitary adenomas secreting large amounts of prolactin may give false low values in immunoradiometric assays. The hook effect. J Endocrinol Invest,1998,21:184-188.

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部