摘要
我国环境争端非诉讼解决方式(ADR)在实施过程中存在观念上的障碍、缺乏系统化的非诉讼解决机制等问题,其比较优势未能有效发挥。因此,我国应建立多元化、系统化非诉讼解决机制;环境争端早期中立评价机构以及司法性ADR机制;完善环境争端解决方式之间的协调性;充分发挥行政处理方式在解决争端中的作用。
There are many problems, such as the obstacle of belief and the lack of systematic non-litigation solution mechanism, in the implementation of the Non-litigation Resolution mode (ADR) for environmental disputes in China, so its comparative advantages cannot be brought into full play. Therefore, China should establish the diversified and systematic non-litigation settlement mechanism as well as the early neutral evaluation agency and judicial ADR mechanism for environmental disputes, perfect the mutual compatibility of the resolution modes for environmental disputes, and, moreover, fully play the role of administrative resolution mode for environmental disputes.
出处
《中国地质大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第2期42-46,共5页
Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
西南政法大学重点课题(XZKT0405)