期刊文献+

论近代中国新学的起源 被引量:1

On the Origin of Xinxue in Modern China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 晚清知识分子立足于社会现实,欲统摄西学而重建新的中学,以避免西化和失落中学。近代意涵的新学基础,在这样的论调下自不能大胆冒进。而在整个中国对西学在跨越中西认同的紧张,出现普遍认同后,新学在短短几年间便蔚为风潮。另,近代中国新学的发韧实亦有参照日本明治维新成功的"东学"催化之功。 In view of the social reality, the progressive scholars in Late Qing Dynasty were enthusiastic about building the Chinese Learning based on the Occidental Learning or Western Learning to avoid Westernization and the loss of self - identity. Consequently, Xinxue or the New Academicism based on the above - mentioned point of view cannot have undergone drastic changes at first. After a consensus was reached that the Occidental Learning was different from Xinxue, a learning combined from both the Chinese Learning and the Occidental Learning, Xinxue developed vigorously within a few years. In addition, the birth of Xinxue was also partly attributed to the inspiration of "the Oriental Learning" the fruit of the Meiji Restoration in Japan.
作者 李兴国
出处 《苏州科技学院学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第1期117-121,共5页 Journal of University of Science and Technology of Suzhou:Social Science
关键词 新学 西学 “东学” 起源 Xinxue the Occidental Learning the Oriental Learning origin
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1冯桂芬.校邠庐抗议[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,1998.
  • 2王德威.重读《荡寇志》[M]//陈平原,等.晚明与晚清:历史传承与文化创新.武汉:湖北教育出版社,2001.
  • 3梁启超.清代学术概论[M].朱维铮编校.梁启超论清学史二种[M].上海: 复旦大学出版社,1984年版.第59页.
  • 4梁启超.戊戌变法记[M]//饮冰室合集:专集之一.北京:中华书局,1984.
  • 5郑观应.西学[M]//盛世危言.郑州:中州古籍出版社,1998.
  • 6张文襄公全集:第4册[M].北京:中国书店,1990.
  • 7宗稷辰.怀新篇[M]//郑振铎.晚清文选.影印本.上海:上海书店,1987.
  • 8郭嵩焘日记:第3卷[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,1982.
  • 9冯自由.政治学序言[M].上海:广智书局,1902.
  • 10王尔敏.十九世纪中国士大夫对中西关系之理解及衍生之新观念[M]//中国近代思想史论.台北:华世出版社,1977.

共引文献39

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部