牵连犯的处罚原则再探讨——基于立法例的分析

Analysis of the Punishment Principle of Implicated Offense——Based on Legislation Examples

按照通说,牵连犯乃实质数罪但科罚一罪,我国立法例是选择性地对牵连犯的处断原则作出多种规定,从而造成了立法的不和谐,也引发了牵连犯在实务中处断的疑惑。同单独的数罪相比,牵连犯的本质是实质数罪,尽管牵连犯的数行为具有牵连关系这个特殊性,但不能成为否定牵连犯应当并罚的理由,牵连犯的社会危害性不是取决于数个犯罪之间的牵连关系,而是根本上取决于其所构成的犯罪的性质、个数和情节等。因此,"数罪并罚说"更为妥当。

Generally speaking, implicated offense belongs to plural crimes in nature but punishment of one crime. China＇s legislation example sets down selective principles for implicated offense, which result in disagreement in legislation and doubts in implementation. Compared to a separate crime, implicated offense belongs to plural crimes in nature despite its implicated relationship, which necessitates joinder of punishment. Its harm to society is not dependent on the relationship of crimes involved, but on the nature, number and circumstances of the crime. Therefore, ＂cumulative punishment＂ is more appropriate.