“逻辑与罪”的“与”

"And" in"Logic and Sin"

维特根斯坦的"逻辑与罪",其"与"究竟是"并列",还是"转入"?一般认为,逻辑是逻辑,罪是罪,"与"停留在陈列两端的平面上。"逻辑"成为裁定"罪"的界限或尺度。但维特根斯坦又意识到,逻辑常常从外在的"并列"向内在"转入"了,即"逻辑"转入了"罪"——"逻辑罪"。这是他毕生最难的划界。其他逻辑学家如罗素者流,则根本还无意识到不着边际的地步。

In Wittgenstein＇s ＂Logic and Sin＂, is ＂and＂ actually means ＂standing side by side＂ or ＂shifting to＂ General researchers regard it as ＂standing side by side＂, logic is logic and sin is sin, ＂and＂ remains only on the plane of both ends. ＂Logic＂ becomes the limits or yardstick. However, Wittgenstein realizes that logic often shifts from ＂standing side by side＂ to the inner part, namely, ＂logic＂ switches to ＂sin＂ -＂logic sin＂, which is the most difficult life- long delimitation puzzling him for his whole life. Other logicians, Bertrand Russell is one of them, are unconscious of this ahnost to the utmost.