期刊文献+

知觉运动学习中的背景干扰效应和元认知监测 被引量:4

THE CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECT AND THE METACOGNITION MONITORING IN PERCEPTUAL-MOTOR LEARNING
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选取大学生为被试,采用两因素混合实验设计,以预期按键反应作为知觉运动学习任务。在运动学习任务中,设置了集中练习和分散练习两种练习方式以及三个练习-测试组块。通过分析不同练习方式和练习-测试组块对练习成绩、测试成绩以及元认知监测的影响,考察运动知觉学习的背景干扰效应、练习伴随低估效应以及元认知监测的依据。结果发现:(1)缩短练习与测试之间的时间间隔,经典的背景干扰效应没有出现;(2)在知觉运动学习的多组块练习过程中,元认知监测准确性没有出现练习伴随低估效应;(3)集中练习组更多地以当前的练习成绩作为依据进行预测,从而导致了对预测的高估。 The present study was designed to investigate the contextual interference effect and the metacognition monitoring in perceptual-motor learning. There were two practice conditions and three practice-test blocks. In the study, 36 undergraduates were asked to press a key in response to the arrival of a light stimulus. According to the results of the present study, we draw conclusions as follows: (1) it needed enough time intervals between practice and test for the CI effect to occur; (2) there was no UWP effect in perceptual-motor learning; and (3) after blocked practices, the subjects predicted the test performance depending more on current practice performance which was a poor indicator of learning benefit.
作者 贾宁 白学军
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 2009年第1期50-55,共6页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 国家社科基金"十一五"规划国家重大课题ABA060004项目 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地08JJDXLX266重大项目 天津市教育科学"十一五"规划C028项目 河北师范大学科研基金资助项目的资助
关键词 练习方式 知觉运动学习 背景干扰效应 练习伴随低估效应 practice conditions perceptual-motor learning CI effect UWP effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献74

  • 1沈大为,韩凯.FOK判断与可接近信息之间的关系[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):320-327. 被引量:9
  • 2屈军,韩凯.模糊再认(FR)判断—元记忆领域的新方法[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):127-132. 被引量:3
  • 3[1]Dunlosky J, Nelson T O. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOLs) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 1992, 20: 373~380
  • 4[2]Shaw R J, Craik F I M. Age differences in performance on a cue recall task. Psychology and Aging, 1989, 4 (2): 131~135
  • 5[3]Carroll M, Nelson T O, Kirwan A. Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: Differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention. Acta Psychologica, 1997, 95: 239~253
  • 6[4]Koriat A. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgment of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1997, 126: 349~370
  • 7[5]Koriat A. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 1993, 100: 609~639
  • 8[6]Koriat A. Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1995, 124: 311~333
  • 9[7]Kelemen W L. Metamemory for related information is determined by the type of mnemonic cue. The Sciences and Engineering, 1999, 59 (7-B): 3726
  • 10[8]Schreiber T A. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cues recall: Implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 1998, 26: 553~571

共引文献63

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部