期刊文献+

Identification of Semaphorin 5A Interacting Protein by Applying Apriori Knowledge and Peptide Complementarity Related to Protein Evolution and Structure

Identification of Semaphorin 5A Interacting Protein by Applying Apriori Knowledge and Peptide Complementarity Related to Protein Evolution and Structure
原文传递
导出
摘要 In the post-genomic era, various computational methods that predict proteinprotein interactions at the genome level are available; however, each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, resulting in false predictions. Here we developed a unique integrated approach to identify interacting partner(s) of Semaphorin 5A (SEMA5A), beginning with seven proteins sharing similar ligand interacting residues as putative binding partners. The methods include Dwyer and Root- Bernstein/Dillon theories of protein evolution, hydropathic complementarity of protein structure, pattern of protein functions among molecules, information on domain-domain interactions, co-expression of genes and protein evolution. Among the set of seven proteins selected as putative SEMA5A interacting partners, we found the functions of Plexin B3 and Neuropilin-2 to be associated with SEMA5A. We modeled the semaphorin domain structure of Plexin B3 and found that it shares similarity with SEMA5A. Moreover, a virtual expression database search and RT-PCR analysis showed co-expression of SEMA5A and Plexin B3 and these proteins were found to have co-evolved. In addition, we confirmed the interaction of SEMA5A with Plexin B3 in co-immunoprecipitation studies. Overall, these studies demonstrate that an integrated method of prediction can be used at the genome level for discovering many unknown protein binding partners with known ligand binding domains. In the post-genomic era, various computational methods that predict proteinprotein interactions at the genome level are available; however, each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, resulting in false predictions. Here we developed a unique integrated approach to identify interacting partner(s) of Semaphorin 5A (SEMA5A), beginning with seven proteins sharing similar ligand interacting residues as putative binding partners. The methods include Dwyer and Root- Bernstein/Dillon theories of protein evolution, hydropathic complementarity of protein structure, pattern of protein functions among molecules, information on domain-domain interactions, co-expression of genes and protein evolution. Among the set of seven proteins selected as putative SEMA5A interacting partners, we found the functions of Plexin B3 and Neuropilin-2 to be associated with SEMA5A. We modeled the semaphorin domain structure of Plexin B3 and found that it shares similarity with SEMA5A. Moreover, a virtual expression database search and RT-PCR analysis showed co-expression of SEMA5A and Plexin B3 and these proteins were found to have co-evolved. In addition, we confirmed the interaction of SEMA5A with Plexin B3 in co-immunoprecipitation studies. Overall, these studies demonstrate that an integrated method of prediction can be used at the genome level for discovering many unknown protein binding partners with known ligand binding domains.
出处 《Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2008年第3期163-174,共12页 基因组蛋白质组与生物信息学报(英文版)
基金 This work was partly supported by Molecular Therapeutics Program,Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services and by Grant CA72781 (to RKS) Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA036727) from National Cancer Institute,National Institutes of Health,USA.
关键词 domain-domain interaction SEMAPHORIN PLEXIN protein interaction prediction domain-domain interaction, semaphorin, plexin, protein interaction prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献56

  • 1[1]Sadanandam,A.,et al.2007.Identification of functional cell adhesion molecules with a potential role in metastasis by a combination of in vivo phage display and in silico analysis.OMICS 11:41-57.
  • 2[2]Bogan,A.A.and Thorn,K.S.1998.Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces.J.Mol.Biol.280:1-9.
  • 3[3]Chakrabarti,P.and Janin,J.2002.Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites.Proteins 47:334-343.
  • 4[4]Jones,S.and Thornton,J.M.1997.Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis.J.Mol.Biol.272:133-143.
  • 5[5]Guharoy,M.and Chakrabarti,P.2005.Conservation and relative importance of residues across proteinprotein interfaces.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 102:15447-15452.
  • 6[6]DeLano,W.L.2002.Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces:progress and challenges.Curr.Opin.Struct.Biol.12:14-20.
  • 7[9]Barbas,C.F.Ⅲ,et al.2001.Phage Display:A Laboratory Manual.Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,Cold Spring Harbor,USA.
  • 8[7]Keskin,O.,et al.2005.Protein-protein interactions:organization,cooperativity and mapping in a bottomup Systems Biology approach.Phys.Biol.2:S24-35.
  • 9[8]Res,I.and Lichtarge,O.2005.Character and evolution of protein-protein interfaces.Phys.Biol.2:S36-43.
  • 10[10]Ma,B.,et al.2003.Protein-protein interactions:structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 100:5772-5777.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部