期刊文献+

上消化道恶性肿瘤患者血清多项肿瘤标志物联合检测的临床意义 被引量:2

Clinical significance of combined detection of serum levels of multiterm tumor markers in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价癌胚抗原(CEA)、唾液酸化岩藻戊糖(CA19—9)、胃肠道癌抗原(CA242)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、胃癌及卵巢癌抗原(CA724)、鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原(SCC)、组织多肽抗原(TPA)、细胞角蛋白(TPS)8项标志物联合检测,对上消化道恶性肿瘤的临床诊断、评价疗效及预后等方面的临床意义。方法对373例上消化道恶性肿瘤患者及50名健康体检者血清标本进行8项标志物检测,评价标志物水平与病情的关系。结果8项标志物诊断阳性率分别为:CEA26.80%,CA19—927.34%,CA24234.14%,AFP2.84%,SCC19.72%,CA72412.13%,TPA34.15%,TPS30.89%。8项标志物联合检查的总阳性率为89.05%。术前CEA、CA242、SCC阳性患者的生存时间较短。上消化道恶性肿瘤患者血清CA242和CA19—9水平呈密切的正相关。结论多项标志物联合检测在上消化道恶性肿瘤不同病理分型及临床分期中差异有统计学意义,且阳性率远高于任何标志物单独检测的结果。CA19—9与CA242可能成为监测病情的最佳组合。CA724、CA242和SCC3项标志物可分别作为贲门、胃、食管恶性肿瘤患者的不良预后指标。 Objective To evaluate clinical significance of the CEA, CA19-9, CA242, AFP, CA724, SCC, TPA, TPS combined detection for the clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer. Methods 373 cases of upper digestive tract malignant tumor patient and 50 cases of healthy serum sample were detected for eight markers, evaluating the relationship between the level of markers and illness. Results 8 marker diagnostic positive rates were: CEA 26.80 %, CA19-9 27.34 %, CA242 34.14 %, AFP 2.84 %, SCC 19.72 %, CA724 12.13 %, TPA 34.15 %, TPS 30.89 %. The total positive rate of joint detection of 8 markers was 89.05 %. Preoperative CEA, CA242, SCC-positive patients had a shorter survival time. CA242 and CA19-9 levels with upper gastrointestinal malignancies were positively correlated. Conclusion The combined detection of a number of markers in different pathological type and clinical staging is statistically significant, and the positive rate is much higher than any single marker test results. CA19-9 and CA242 may be the best combination of monitoring the disease. CA724, CA242 and SCC can be as adverse prognostic indicators for cardia, stomach, esophageal malignant tumors, respectively.
出处 《肿瘤研究与临床》 CAS 2009年第3期174-177,共4页 Cancer Research and Clinic
关键词 胃肠肿瘤 肿瘤标志物 联合检测 Gastrointestinal neoplasms Tumor markers Combined detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1陈益定,郑树,余捷凯,胡汛.血清蛋白质质谱模型在大肠癌诊断中的应用[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2004,26(7):417-420. 被引量:42
  • 2Ychou M, Khemissa-Akouz F, Kramar A, et al. A comparison of serum Cyfra 21-1 and SCC AG in the diagnosis of squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. Bull Cancer, 2001, 88:1023-1027.
  • 3Kawaguchi H, Ohno S, Miyazaki M, et al. CYFRA 21-1 detemdnation in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical utility for detection of recurrences. Cancer, 2000, 89:1413-1417.
  • 4Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, et al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer, Lancet, 2002,359:572-577.
  • 5Zhou G, Li H, Decamp D, et al. 2D differential in-gel electrophoresis for the identification of esophageal cans cell cancer-specific protein markers. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2002, 1:117-124.
  • 6van Dalen A. Quality control and standardization of tumor marker tests. Tumor Biol, 1993,14:131-135.
  • 7王恩华 杨光华 主编.消化道肿瘤[A].杨光华,主编.病理学:第5版[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.196-203.
  • 8Seibert V, Wiesner A, Buschmann T, et al. Surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI TOF-MS) and ProteinChip technology in proteomics research. Pathol Res Pract. 2004,200:83-94.
  • 9Fung ET, Enderwick C. ProteinChip clinical proteomics:computational challenges and solutions. Biotechniques, 2002,Suppl:34-41.
  • 10Breimann LJ, Friedmann RO, Sone C. Classification and regression tress. 1st ed. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1984. 87-90.

共引文献44

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部