期刊文献+

贫困大学生大五人格和应对方式的关系 被引量:2

Relationship of Big Five Personality with Coping Styles in Poor Undergraduates
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨贫困大学生大五人格因素与应对方式的关系。方法:采用大五人格问卷与应对方式量表调查了600名贫困大学生。结果:层次回归分析的结果显示,在控制了人口统计学变量之后,大五人格因素所解释的应对方式的方差变异量,在积极应对和消极应对两个维度分别为22%和16%。具体而言,外向性和责任感对积极应对有正向的影响;年级和神经质对积极应对有负向的影响;是否独生子女和宜人性对消极应对有负向的影响。结论:大五人格因素能够有效预测贫困大学生的应对方式。 Objective: To explore the relationship of big five personality with coping styles. Methods: 600 poor undergraduates were assessed by Big Five Personality Scale and Coping Styles Questionnaire. Results: Hierarchical regression indicated that 22% variance of positive coping styles and 16% variance of negative coping styles were explained by big five personality. Exactly, Grade was a negative predictor of positive coping styles, while Extravert, Emotional Stability and Conscientiousness were effective predictors of positive coping styles; Whether the only child or not was a negative predictor of negative coping styles, while Agreeableness was an effective predictor of negative coping styles. But Openness can't predict coping styles effectively in this survey. Conclusion: Big five personality was a powerful predictor.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2009年第5期940-942,共3页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 应对方式 大五人格 层次回归 Coping styles Big five personality Hierarchical regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1李文道,钮丽丽,邹泓.中学生压力生活事件、人格特点对压力应对的影响[J].心理发展与教育,2000,16(4):8-13. 被引量:77
  • 2陈红,黄希庭,郭成.中学生人格特征与应对方式的相关研究[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):520-522. 被引量:71
  • 3潘敏,石丽,周金莲,李丹,袁琼,周威,黄万琪.不同学科大学生应对方式的差异性分析[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(44):54-55. 被引量:21
  • 4陈岩,雷蕾,鲁伟,静进.医科大学贫困生的心理应付方式特点[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(30):42-44. 被引量:5
  • 5洪炜.医学心理学[M].北京:北京医科大学出版社,2002.53-61.
  • 6兰玉萍 张静芬.中学生应付方式的调查研究[J].社会心理研究,2003,(2).
  • 7Weems G H,Onwuegbuzie A J.The impact of midpoint responses and reverse coding on survey data.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 2001,34(3):166~176
  • 8Sandoval J,Lambert N M.Reliability and validity of teacher rating procedures in the assessment of hyperactivity as a function of rating scale format.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Toronto,Canada.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 160 614),1978.1~20
  • 9Schriesheim C A,Hill K D.Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals:The effect on questionnaire validity.Educational and Psychological Measurement,1981,41:1101~1114
  • 10Williams R L,Bush V J,Park S H et al.Work Ethic Scale for middle school students.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 452 257),2001:1~15

共引文献27

同被引文献54

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部