期刊文献+

基于公交服务水平提高的道路拥挤定价收入再分配 被引量:4

Redistribution of Revenue from Road Congestion Pricing Based on the Improvement of Public Transport Services
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将道路拥挤定价收入再分配与公共交通问题相结合,分析城市客运交通系统中交通出行者的出行路径、出行方式选择行为,构建基于公交服务水平提高的道路拥挤定价收入再分配双层规划模型。上层规划为交通系统优化,下层规划为道路拥挤定价收入再分配下路网弹性需求随机用户平衡。算例分析结果表明,将道路拥挤定价收入用于提高公交服务水平,相对于只实施拥挤定价而不进行收入再分配而言,私人小汽车、出租车、公车需求分别减少47350,47251,7094人次,公交车需求增加101695人次。综合考虑车辆的换算系数、客运方式人均占用道路面积和载客率,削减交通量10.70%,提高了交通运输效率。 Integrating the redistribution of revenue from road congestion pricing and public transport, the choice behavior of travel mode and travel route of travelers in an urban passenger transportation system is analyzed. A bi-level revenue redistribution programming is established based on revenue from road conges- tion pricing by the improvement of public transport service. The upper level of the model optimizes the traffic system and the lower level of the model interprets the problem about stochastic user equilibrium of road network under the redistribution of revenue from road congestion pricing. The results of the example analysis show that under the policy of congestion pricing with revenue redistribution, compared to congesion pricing without the consideration of revenue redistribution, private car trips decrease by 47 350 person-time, taxi trips decrease 47 251 person-time, government car trips decrease by 7 094 person-time and bus trips increase by 101 695 person-time. With the comprehensive consideration of vehicle conversion coefficient, road area per capita and occupancy rates, vehicle flow is decreased by 10.70 %, and the transport efficiency is further improved.
出处 《中国铁道科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期131-136,共6页 China Railway Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70503008) 黑龙江省博士后资助项目(AUGA41100032)
关键词 道路拥挤定价 收入再分配 公交服务水平 双层规划 Road congestion pricing Redistribution of revenue Public transport service level Bi-levelprogramming
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1NAKAMURA K, KOCKELMAN K. Congestion Pricing and Roadspace Rationing: an Application to the San Francisco Bay Bridge Corridor[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2002, 36:403-417.
  • 2CALFEE J, WINSTON C. The Value of Automobile Travel Time: Implications for Congestion Policy [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1998, 69: 102-183.
  • 3GOODWIN P B, JONES P M. Road Pricing: The Political and Strategic Possibilities [R]. Paris: European Conference of Ministers of Transport, 1989: 5-59.
  • 4SMALL K A. Using the Revenues from Congestion Pricing [J]. Transportation, 1992, 19 : 359-381.
  • 5LITMAN T. Using Road Pricing Revenue: Economic Efficiency and Equity Considerations[J].Transportation Research Record, 1996, 1558: 24-28.
  • 6HAU T D. Congestion Pricing and Road Investment [C]//Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment: Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1998: 39-78.
  • 7FERRARI P. Road Pricing and Users' Surplus[J]. Transport Policy, 2005, 12 (6): 477-487.
  • 8ARMELIUS H, HULTKRANTZ L. The Politico-Economic Link between Public Transport and Road Pricing: An Ex-Ante Study of the Stockholm Road-Pricing Trial[J]. Transport Policy, 2006, 13 (1) : 162-172.
  • 9邬万江,张连富,贾洪飞.交通拥挤收费与社会剩余分析[J].交通标准化,2005,33(10):96-99. 被引量:5
  • 10黄海军,MichaelG.H.Bell,杨海.公共与个体竞争交通系统的定价研究[J].管理科学学报,1998,1(2):17-23. 被引量:75

二级参考文献12

共引文献114

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部