期刊文献+

企业内部业绩评价多样性的行为影响研究——基于员工激励计划的实证分析

Study on the Behavioral Effects of the Internal Performance Measurement Diversity in Individual Incentive Plans
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用结构方程模型,通过构建业绩指标与员工行为反应之间的关系模型,对员工激励计划中表现出的业绩评价指标多样性进行了行为影响研究。结果表明:业绩评价指标多样性水平越高,员工感受到的角色模糊水平越高;员工感受到的角色模糊水平反向影响着员工的个人业绩和工作满意度;评价多样性与员工行为反应之间的关系受个体人格特征的调节,价值承诺水平越高,员工的角色模糊水平或角色冲突水平越低。 Since the 1990s, how to establish a comprehensive performance measurement system has been a popular topic in recent accounting research. While empirical researches haven' t reached the agreement on the direct relations between the system and the organization' s performance. According to the conflicting results, this study examines the behavioral responses to individual incentive plans balancing multipie performance measures. Conclusions of the SEM analysis are: firstly, measurement diversity in incentive plan is positively correlated with the level of role ambiguity experienced by the subordinate. Secondly, role ambiguity experienced by the subordinate is negatively correlated with individual performance and individual performance is positively correlated with job-satisfaction. Thirdly, subordinates with higher (lower) value commitment experience lower (higher) role conflict / role ambiguity in response to the measuremant diversity in incentive plan.
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期77-84,共8页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
关键词 内部业绩评价 指标多样性 行为影响 结构方程 internal performance measurement measurement diversity behavioral effects structural equation modeling (SEM)
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Davis J H, Schoorman F D, Donaldson L. Toward a stewardship theory of management[ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1997,22 (1):20-47.
  • 2Atkinson A, Epstein M. Measure for measure: realizing the power of the balanced scorecard[J].CMA Management, 2000, (9) : 22-28.
  • 3Bonner S E, Sprinkle G B. The Effects of Monetary Incentives on Effort and Task Performance: Theories, Evidence, and a Framework for Research[ J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2002,27(5) :303 - 345.
  • 4Chenhall R H. Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency- based research and directions for the future [ J ]. Accounting, Organizations and Society,2003,28(2 - 3) : 127 - 168.
  • 5Chenhall R H. Integrative strategic performance Measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufactuing, learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study[ J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society,2005,30(5) :395 - 422.
  • 6Covaleski M A,Evans J H,Luft J L,Shields M D. Budgeting research: three theoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration[J]. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2003, (15):3-49.
  • 7tDatar S, Kulp S, Lambert R. Balancing Performance Measures[J] .Journal of Accounting Research,2001,39(1) :75 - 92.
  • 8Davis S, Albright T. An Investigation of the Effect of Balanced Scorecard Implementation on Financial Performance[ J]. Management Accounting Research, 2004,15(2) : 135 - 153.
  • 9Hall M. The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance [ J ]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2008,33(2 - 3) : 141 - 163.
  • 10Hartmann F G.The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory[ J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society,2000, (25) :451 - 482.

二级参考文献47

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部