期刊文献+

区域工业环境影响经济损益综合评判研究--以西安市为例 被引量:1

Study on the Comprehensive Evaluation of Environmental Benefits and Losses for Regional Industrial Enterprises——A Case Study of Xi'an City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了综合判断区域工业行业的环境影响和经济效益,分别定义了工业环境影响评判系数和工业环境经济系数,建立了相应的数学模型,并以西安市为例进行研究。研究结果表明:电力、热力的生产和供应业以及造纸及纸制品业对西安市的环境影响最大,环境影响系数分别为0.332 2和0.304 6;环境经济系数较差的依次为黑色金属矿采选业、有色金属矿采选业、造纸及纸制品业、电力及热力的生产和供应业,环境经济系数分别为151.650 0、34.798 31、9.652 08、.032 2。环境影响与经济效益评判模型的建立为区域环境管理和产业结构调整提供了依据。 To judge actually the regional environmental impact degree and comprehensive benefit of industrial enterprises, this paper defines the coefficients of environmental impact and environment-economy respectively and constructs their models on the basis of pollutants discharged, environmental pollution loss brought by industrial enterprises and its ratio to value-addition of industry. Xi'an City was taken as a case of study. The results show that the generation and supply of electric power and heating power and the paper-making and its products have the maximum environmental impact coefficients of 0. 3322 and 0. 3046, and the environment-economy coefficient ranking from the first to the fourth is as follows: ferrous metals mining and dressing, nonferrous metals mining and dressing, papermaking and paper products, and generation and supply of electric power and heating power, with their coefficients respectively being 151.65, 34. 7983,19. 6520 and 8. 0322. These models can provide the scientific basis for managing the regional environment and directing the industrial restructuring and promote the sustainable development among regional economy, society and environment.
出处 《安全与环境工程》 CAS 2009年第2期14-17,共4页 Safety and Environmental Engineering
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(03BJY025)资助
关键词 区域工业 环境影响 经济效益 综合评判 regional industrial enterprises environmental impact economic effects comprehensive evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献50

  • 1许绿丝,程俊峰,曾汉才.煤燃烧过程中痕量元素As、Cd、Cr释放特性实验研究[J].热能动力工程,2004,19(5):478-482. 被引量:20
  • 2朱发庆,高冠民,李国倜,栗晋斌,秦工一.东湖水污染经济损失研究[J].环境科学学报,1993,13(2):214-222. 被引量:68
  • 3刘光生,李太山.硫酸亚铁还原法除地下水中六价铬[J].重庆环境科学,1995,17(4):21-23. 被引量:12
  • 4王文兴,王纬,张婉华,洪少贤.我国SO_2和NO_X排放强度地理分布和历史趋势[J].中国环境科学,1996,16(3):161-167. 被引量:63
  • 5李青 杨健慧 李强 等.[R].北京:中国科学院理化技术研究所,2002.32-40.
  • 6ISO/DIS 14042 - 1999, Environmental llfe-life cycle asaessnmnt- Life cycle impact assessment[S].
  • 7Helias A Udo de Haes, Oiivier Jolliet, C,6ran Finnveden, et al. Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment: background document for the second workinggroup on life cycle impact assessment of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2)[J].International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1999,4 ( 2 ) : 66-74;1994(3):167-174.
  • 8Nigge K M. Life cycle assessment of natural gas vehides [ M ]. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 2000.137.
  • 9Heijungs R.Environmental life cycle assessment of products.[M] .Leiden:Centrum voor Milieukunde,1992:27-28
  • 10Craighill A L, Powell J C. Life cycle assessment and economic evaluation of recycling: a case study[J]. Resource Conservation and Recycling, 1996,17 (2): 75-96

共引文献239

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部