期刊文献+

根治性子宫切除术中系统保留盆腔自主神经的临床研究 被引量:20

Clinical study on sparing the pelvic autonomic nerve during the radical hysterectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察根治性子宫切除术中系统保留盆腔自主神经(PAN)的临床效果。方法对2007年6月至2008年4月南方医科大学南方医院等5家医院收治的40例子宫颈癌及子宫内膜癌患者实施根治性子宫切除术中保留PAN的手术,观察手术的成功率,手术前后膀胱功能、肛门和(或)直肠功能变化。结果(1)33例成功保留双侧PAN,成功率82.5%(A组);7例失败,占17.5%(B组),失败的原因为肥胖、术中出血多及盆腔粘连等。(2)A、B两组的手术切除范围无差异,均达Ⅲ型子宫切除术标准。(3)手术平均时间:A组:(200.3±64.8)min,B组:(190.4±50.9)min,P>0.05;术中出血量:A组:(714.6±387.6)mL,B组:(614.3±11.6)mL,P>0.05;平均留置尿管时间:A组:(8.6±2.0)d,B组:(17.7±4.9)d,P<0.01;术后排气时间:A组:(58.5±20.3)h,B组:(81.3±6.2)h,P<0.05;术后排便时间:A组:(90.6±29.0)h,B组:(115.4±46.4)h,P<0.05。结论根治性子宫切除术中系统保留PAN有助于尽快恢复膀胱功能以及肛门和(或)直肠功能。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of sparing the pelvic autonomic nerve (PAN)during the radical hysterectomy. Methods Between June 2007 and April 2008, forty patients underwent nerve sparing radical hysterectomy, and their success rates of surgery, their lower urethra/bladder and anal/rectum function before and after the operation were observed. Results Of the 40 patients 33 patients were successfully spared the bilateral PAN, the rate being 82. 5% ( group A) ; however, the remaining 7 patients failed to preserve the nerve, the rate being 17. 5% ( group B). Reasons for not preserving the nerves were obesity, much more blood loss during the operation, pelvic adhesion and so on. (2)There is no difference between group A and group B in the excision extent, beth of which reached to the standard of III hysterectomy. (3) The mean operation time of group A and group B were (200. 3±64. 8)min and ( 190. 4±50.9)min respec- tively, with no significant difference( P 〉 0. 05 ) ; the estimated blood loss during operation of group A and group B were (714. 6 ±387.6) mL and (614. 3 ± 11.6) mL,with no significant difference (P 〉0. 05). The media duration of postoperative catheterization was significantly shorter in group A (8. 6 ± 2. 0days ) than that in group B ( 17.7 ± 4. 9 days, P 〈 0.01 ). The first exhaust time of group A and group B was (58. 5±20. 3) hours and (81.3±6. 2) hours,with a significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; the first stool time of group A and group B was ( 90. 6± 29.0 ) hours and ( 115.4 ±46. 4 ) hours, with a significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion During radical hysterectomy, sparing the PAN can benefit the lower urethra/bladder and anal/rectum function.
出处 《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期206-209,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics
关键词 子宫颈癌 子宫内膜癌 根治性子宫切除术 保留盆腔自主神经 cervical cancer endometriai cancer radical hysterectomy sparing pelvic autonomic nerve
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with eervieal cancer [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 1974,44:265-262.
  • 2Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, et al. Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type Ⅲ [ J ]. Gynecol Oncol,2000,79 ( 2 ) : 154-157.
  • 3Kuwabara Y, Suzuki M, Hashimoto M, et al. New method to prevent bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer[ J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2000,26 (1): 1-8.
  • 4Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve[ J]. Gynecol Oncol,2004, ;93 ( 2 ) :307-314.
  • 5Sakuragi N, Todo Y, Kudo M, et al. A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function [ J ]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2005,15(2) :387-397.
  • 6臧荣余,程玺,汤洁,杨慧娟.子宫次广泛/广泛切除手术保留盆腔植物神经对膀胱功能恢复保护作用的初步观察[J].现代妇产科进展,2006,15(10):773-775. 被引量:21
  • 7李斌,张蓉,吴令英,张功逸,李贤,俞高志.保留盆腔植物神经的广泛性子宫切除术治疗子宫颈癌的初步研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2008,43(8):606-610. 被引量:19

二级参考文献24

  • 1Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol, 1974,44:265-272.
  • 2Lee YN, Wang KL, Lin MH, et aL Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for treatment of cervical cancer: a clinical review of 954 cases. Gynecel Oncel, 1989,32 : 135 -142.
  • 3Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, et aL Dissection of the cardinal ligament in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with emphasis on the lateral ligament. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1991, 164:7-14.
  • 4Hockel M, Konerding MA, Heussel CE Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998,178:971-976.
  • 5Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, et aL Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type Ⅲ. Gynecol Oncol,2000,79:154-157.
  • 6Charoenkwan K, Srisomboon J, Suprasert P, et al. Nerve-sparing class Ⅲ radical hysterectomy: a modified technique to spare the pelvic autonomic nerves without compromising radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2006,16 : 1705-1712.
  • 7Kato K, Suzuka K, Osaki T, et al. Unilateral or bilateral nervesparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique to preserve the pelvic autonomic nerves while increasing radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2007,17 : 1172-1178.
  • 8Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N, et al. Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol,2007 ,107 :4-13.
  • 9Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, et al. Radical hysterectomy: an anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection. Gynecol Oncol, 2000,77 : 155-163.
  • 10Benadetti-Panici P, Zullo MA, Plotti F, et al. Long-term bladder function in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type 3-4 radical hysterectomy. Cancer,2004,100:2110-2117.

共引文献36

同被引文献242

引证文献20

二级引证文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部