摘要
采用元分析方法对51篇大学新生的SCL-90研究报告的数据进行再分析.结果表明:51项研究与全国大学生常模比较,平均效果量d值介于-0.66～-0.25之间;男生与女生对比显示的平均效果量d值很微小;报告质量效应和出版年代效应显著.
This paper collects 51 research reports investigating University Freshmen＇s psychological problems with SCL-90 （Symptom Checklist 90） as the tool and re-analyzes the data in them using the meta-analysis method. The results indicate that the average effect size （d） of comparison of the data in these reports with the norm of university students varies between -- 0. 66 and --0.25; the d is small when boy students are compared with girl students; and the year-of-publication effect and quality-rank effect are significant statistically.
出处
《西南大学学报（自然科学版）》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第2期152-155,共4页
Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition)
基金
西南大学国家重点学科基础心理学科研基金资助项目(NSKD06002)
