期刊文献+

当代人工智能表征的分解方法及其问题 被引量:2

The Analysis Method of Contemporary Artificial Intelligence Representation and Its Problems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分解方法是建立在形式系统之上的人工智能表征的必然选择,也是造成现阶段人工智能表征在自然语言语义理解方面各种瓶颈问题的理论根源。文章认为,句子层次结构以及三个平面的划界理论是分解方法难以实现段落或篇章语义理解的关键所在。基于词汇的语境描写方法难以突破单句限制,人工智能表征要想获得突破,就必须借助基于段落或篇章的整体性语境描写方法,而这正是分解方法所缺失的。多年来,人工智能表征取得的成就表明,脱离分解方法去谈整体性语境构建方法是不切实际的。整体性语境构建方法应当以分解方法为基础,二者之间是一脉相承而非矛盾的关系。二者的有机融合,是解决人工智能表征分解方法瓶颈的关键所在。 The analysis method is the necessary selection of artificial intelligence representation which is based on formal system.It is also the theoretical root of various bottleneck problems of artificial intelligence representation in the natural language semantic understanding at present.Therefore,it is necessary to reflect on it.The hierarchical structure of sentences and the demarcation of the three-plane theory are the crux for the analysis method not to be able to achieve the semantic understanding of paragraph or text.The context description method which is based on the word is difficult to break through the restriction of the single-sentence.In order to get a breakthrough,the artificial intelligence representation must use the holistic context description method which is based on the paragraph or the text.And this is what the analysis method is missing.Over the years,the achievements of artificial intelligence representation showed that it is unrealistic to talk about the holistic context constructing method without the analysis method.The holistic context constructing method should be based on the analysis method,and they are not contradictory.The combination of the two is the key to solving the bottlenecks of the analysis method of artificial intelligence representation.
作者 殷杰 董佳蓉
出处 《科学技术与辩证法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期23-28,89,共7页 Science Technology and Dialectics
基金 霍英东教育基金会高等院校青年教师基金项目(111105) 全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目(200503)
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Howard Gardner. The Mind' s New Science : A History of the Cognitive Revolution[ M ]. New York:Basic Books,Inc. Publishers, 1985:38.
  • 2Robert Audi. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy [ M ]. Cambridge University Press,1999:54.
  • 3http ://en. wikipedia, org,/wiki/Analysis. 2009 - 01 - 28.
  • 4殷杰.语境主义世界观的特征[J].哲学研究,2006(5):94-99. 被引量:47
  • 5Morris C. Foundation of the Theory of Signs ( 1938 ) . Writing on the General Theory of Signs [ C ]. The Hague : Mouton, 1971:21 - 22.
  • 6Morris C. Signs, Language and Behavior [ M ]. Englewood Cliffs, 1946:219.
  • 7Noam Chomsky. Syntactic Structures [ M ]. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, 1957 : 19.
  • 8尼古拉斯·布宁,余纪元.西方哲学英汉对照词典[s].北京:人民出版社,2001:1018.
  • 9http ://en. wikipedia, org/wiki/Natural_language_processing. 2008 - 12 - 08.
  • 10Michael Dummett. Origins of Analytic Philosophy [ M ]. Harvard University Press, 1993:5.

二级参考文献11

  • 1魏敦友.释义与批判─—哈贝马斯的“交往合理性”述评[J].江汉论坛,1995(7):26-31. 被引量:13
  • 2冯志伟.基于经验主义的语料库研究[J].术语标准化与信息技术,2007(1):29-36. 被引量:12
  • 3维特根斯坦.哲学研究[M].李步楼,译.北京:商务印书馆.2005.
  • 4国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要:2006-2020年[N].新华社北京2007-02-09电.全文见http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-02/09/content_183787.htm.
  • 5Forder. The Language of Thought[M]. Havard University Press, 1975:2.
  • 6玛格丽特·博登.人工智能哲学[C].刘西瑞,王汉琦译.上海:上海译文出版社,2005:394.
  • 7Howard Gardner. The Mind's New Science:A History of the Cognitive Revolution[M]. Basic Books, Inc. , Publishers/New York, 1985 : 28-48.
  • 8C Fillmore. Background to Frame Net[J]. International Journal of Lexicography, 2003 (18) : 235 - 250.
  • 9G Miller. Word Net:An on-line Lexieal Database[J]. International Journal of Lexicography, 1990(4):235-312.
  • 10李国杰.对计算机科学的反思[J]中国计算机学会通讯,2005.

共引文献129

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部