摘要
目的:为了评估Ⅱ型糖尿病(DM)患者亚临床神经系统的病变。方法:本文通过对47例无神经系统病变症状与体征的Ⅱ型糖尿病患者和30例健康体检者,同时进行了听觉脑干诱发电位(BAEP)、视觉诱发电位(VEP)和周围感觉神经传导速度(SCV)的测定。结果:DM组BAEP的波峰间期(IPL)和VEP的P100潜伏期较对照组均明显延长,有统计学上的差异(P<0.05);DM组的SCV较对照组显著减慢(P<0.05)。其中DM组BAEP的I~VIPL异常率为70.21%,VEP的P100潜伏期异常率为63.83%。两者较SCV异常率(25.53~34.04%)为高(P<0.01)。结论:Ⅱ型DM患者早期已存在广泛的亚临床神经病变,BAEP、VEP和SCV是早期诊断DM亚临床神经系统病变重要手段,其中BAEP的I~VIPL和VEP的P100为最敏感的诊断指标。
Objective:To evaluate subclinical nervous system complications in type Ⅱ diabetic patients.Methods:The brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP),Visual evoked potential (VEP) and peripheral sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) were detected in 47 type 2 diabetic patients of no clinical nervous system complications and 30 healthy controls.Results:Interpeak Latency (IPL) of BAEP and Latency of P100 were significantly prolonged in type 2 diabetic patients comparing with those in healthy controls (P<0.05) ;the SNCV of the type 2 diabetic patients were significantly slower than those of healtly controls (P<0.05);the abnormal ratio of I~V IPL and Latency of P100 were 70.21% and 63.83% respectively,were significantly higher than those of SNCV (25.53~3404)% in type 2 diabetic patients (P〗<0.01). Conclusion:The type 2 diabetic patients have had multilatery subclinical nerves system complications in early phase.BAEP、VEP. and SNCV are all important methods in early diagnosing subclinical nervous system complications,but I~VIPL and latency of P100 are most sensitive diagnostic index.
出处
《河北医学》
CAS
1998年第3期6-9,共4页
Hebei Medicine