期刊文献+

单双管负压引流在乳腺癌改良根治术中的应用及效果比较

下载PDF
导出
摘要 将80例乳腺癌行改良根治术患者随机分为单管负压引流组27例和双管负压引流组53例,并对其不同引流方法下皮瓣坏死及皮瓣下积液的发生率进行回顾性分析。结果表明,双管负压引流组皮瓣坏死和皮瓣下积液的发生率低于单管负压引流组(P<0.05)。认为乳腺癌改良根治术后行双管负压引流,可减少皮瓣下积液和皮瓣坏死的发生,且对术后行放疗及化疗提供了保障。
出处 《齐鲁护理杂志(下半月刊)(外科护理)》 2009年第2期51-51,共1页 Journal of Qilu Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

  • 1[1]Kathaleen AP, Susan O'Connor, et al. Electrocautery a s a factor in Seroma formation following mastectomy[J]. Am J Surg,1998,176(1) :8-11.
  • 2[2]Jorien Bonnema, Albert N van Geel, et al. Aprospective random iaed trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary dissectionfor breas t cancer[J]. Am J Surg,1997,173(1):76-79.
  • 3[3]Tejler G, Aspegren K. Complications and hospital stay after surge ry for breast cancer: a prospective study of 385 patients[J]. Br J Surg, 1990, 160(2): 481-484.
  • 4[4]Morris AM. A controlled trial of closed wound suction[J]. Br J S urg,1973, 60(11):357-359.
  • 5[5]Say CC, Donegan W. Abiostatistical evaluation of complications fr om mastectomy[J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1974,138(7):370-375.
  • 6[6]Orr RK, Ketcham AS,Robinson DS, et al. Early discharge after mastectomy: a safe way of diminishing hospital costs[J]. Am Surg, 1987,53(2): 161-163.
  • 7[7]Cameron AEP,Ebbs SR, Wylie F, et al. Suction drainage of the axilla: a prospective randomized trial[J]. Br J Surg,1988, 75(6):1211.
  • 8[8]Somers RG, Jablon LK, Kaplan MJ, et al. The use of closed suc tion drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer[ J]. Ann Surg,1992, 215(3):146-149.
  • 9[9]Barwell J, Watkins RM. How long should suction drains stay in afte r breast surgery with axillary dissection[J] Ann R Coll Surg Engl,1997,79(9) :435-437.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部