对莫尔乌托邦政治理念的新认识

A New Understanding of More's Theory of Ideal Politics

将莫尔的"乌托邦"概念与中文"空想"一词等同起来,或将"乌托邦社会主义"译成中文"空想社会主义",类似的翻译和诠释不尽妥切,会引起许多不必要的误解。文章以莫尔的原著为基础,并从文艺复兴人文主义思想文化的内涵、莫尔的理想政治构架、西方思想的源流和学术界各种探索为视角,就上述学术问题作一个梳理、评述。文章的核心观点是,学人不应当用空想来替换乌托邦概念,事实上莫尔的乌托邦是包含诸多现实内容、诸多现实矛盾的理想政治社会。

It is rather unreasonable and misleading to equate More＇ s concept of Utopia with the Chinese word ＂空想＂ （fancy） , or to translate the term ＂Utopian Socialism＂ into ＂空想社会主义＂ （Fancied Socialism） in Chinese. Based on More＇ s original work, this paper sorts out and makes comments about the issue of Utopia from the perspectives of Renaissance humanistic culture, More＇ s framework of ideal politics, the origin and development of Western thought, and various academic explorations. The gist of the paper is as follows ： scholars should not replace Utopia with fancy ; as a matter of fact, More＇ s Utopia is an ideal political society with rich content of reality and real contradictions of a secular society.