期刊文献+

脊柱侧凸Lenke分型和PUMC分型系统一致性差异对手术融合范围影响的比较研究 被引量:3

Comparative study of effect of reliability between Lenke and PUMC classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis upon surgical fusion range
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较脊柱侧凸Lenke分型和协和(PUMC)SY型系统一致性差异对手术融合范围的影响。方法随机选取青少年特发性脊柱侧凸62例,5名脊柱外科医生根据术前站立正侧位、仰卧位左右弯曲X线片进行分型。3周后,将病例顺序打乱,重复相同程序分型,每个病例共计10人次分型。根据5名医生的分型结果,分别探讨两种分型产生的一致性差异对手术融合范围选择的影响。结果Lenke分型系统弯曲类型参数及PUMC分型的一致性均很好。Lenke分型弯曲类型参数10人次分型结果24例有分歧,PUMC分型10人次分型结果17例有分歧,差异无统计学意义。Lenke弯曲类型分歧病例中仅2例不影响融合范围,PUMC分歧病例中有7例不影响融合范围,差异有统计学意义。24例Lenke弯曲类型分歧病例用PUMC分型,有14例一致;17例PUMC分歧病例用Lenke弯曲类型分型,7例一致,但做一致性检验表明两种分型一致性好。24例Lenke弯曲类型分歧病例用PuMC分型后有19例不影响融合范围,17例PUMC分歧病例用Lenke弯曲类型分型后只有9例不影响融合范围,差异无统计学意义。结论Lenke分型中决定手术融合范围的是弯曲类型参数,其与PUMC分型的可信度和可重复性均很好。但PUMC分型较简单实用,较少引起分歧,即使引起分歧,也有近半数的病例并不影响手术融合范围的选择。 Objective To compare the effect of reliability between Lenke and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) classification systems for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) upon surgical fusion range. Methods 62 scoliosis cases were classificated according to Lenke classification system and PUMC classification system by 5 spine surgeons, and each case was done twice. The reliability and consistency between the two classification systems were investigated and evaluated. Results The reliability and consistency were good-to-excellent in the curve type parameter of Lenke classification system and PUMC classification system. According to Lenke curve type classification, there were 24 cases of disagreements, 2 cases of them without effection to bone fusion. According PUMC classification, there were 17 cases of disagreements, 7 of them without effection to fusio. In the 24 Lenke disagreemrnt cases, 14 cases had the consistency result according to PUMC classification; while in 17 PUMC disagreement cases, 7 cases had the consistency result according to Lenke curve type classification. There were good coherence between the two classification systems. 24 Lenke disagreement cases categorized according to PUMC classification, 19 cases did not affect fusion range; while 17 PUMC disagreements cases placed under Lenke curve type classification only 9 cases did not affect fusion level. There were no significant difference. Conclusion In Lenke classification system curve type parameter determines fusion levels, sharing good-to-excellent reliability to the PUMC classification. However the PUMC classification is simpler in use, with fewer disagreements, as well as nearly half of disagreement cases not affecting fusion levels selection.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期305-309,共5页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
关键词 脊柱侧凸 分类法 脊柱融合术 Scoliosis Classification Spinal fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. A New and Reliable 3-Dimen-sional Classification System of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Presented at Scoliosis Research Society, St. Louis, Missouri, 1997.
  • 2Qiu G, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. A new operative classification of idiopathic scoliosis: a Peking Union Medical College method. Spine, 2005, 30: 1419-1426.
  • 3Lenke LG, Betz RR, Clements D, et al. Curve prevalence of a new classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does clas- sification correlate with treatment? Spine, 2002, 27: 604-611.
  • 4Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Walton T, et al. Can we predict the ultimate lumbar curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing a selective fusion with undercorrection of the thoracic curve? Spine, 2004, 29: 277-285.
  • 5Puno RM, An KC, Puno RL, et al. Treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis: an assessment of the Lenke classification. Spine, 2003, 28:2102-2115.
  • 6Edwards CC 2nd, Lenke LG, Peelle M, et al. Selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with C modifier lumbar curves: 2- to 16-year radiographic and clinical results. Spine, 2004, 29: 536-546.
  • 7Cil A, Pekmezci M, Yazici M, et al. The validity of Lenke criteria for defining structural proximal thoracic curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 2005, 30: 2550-2555.
  • 8邱贵兴,李其一,王以朋,仉建国,于斌,王亭,余可谊,钱军,赵宇,李佳忆,沈健雄,翁习生,杨新宇.脊柱侧凸Lenke分型和PUMC分型系统可信度和可重复性的对比分析研究[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(33):2332-2335. 被引量:8
  • 9Svanholm H, Starklint H, Gundersen H J, et al. Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic. APMIS, 1989, 97: 689-698.
  • 10King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, et al. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1983, 65: 1302-1313.

二级参考文献33

  • 1邱贵兴,徐宏光,王以朋,沈建雄,翁习生,仉建国,赵宇.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸术后失代偿原因分析及处理[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(7):414-417. 被引量:24
  • 2King HA,Moe JH,Bradford DS,et al.The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1983,65:1302-1313.
  • 3Lenke LG,Betz RR,Harms J,et al.Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),2001,83:1169-1181.
  • 4Qiu G,Zhang J,Wang Y,et al.A new operative classification of idiopathic scoliosis:a Peking Union Medical College method.Spine,2005,30:1419-1426.
  • 5Nash CL Jr,Moe JH.A study of vertebral rotation.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1969,51:223-229.
  • 6Richards BS,Birch JG,Herring JA,et al.Frontal plane and sagittal plane balance following Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis.Spine,1989,14:733-737.
  • 7Frez R,Cheng JC,Wong EM.Longitudinal changes in trunkal balance after selective fusion of King Ⅱ curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine,2000,25:1352-1359.
  • 8Suk SI,Lee SM,Chung ER,et al.Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idipathic scoliosis:more than 5-year follow-up.Spine,2005,30:1602-1609.
  • 9Ogon M,Giesinger K,Behensky H,et al.Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Lenke's new scoliosis classification system.Spine,2002,27:858-862.
  • 10Richards BS,Sucato DJ,Konigsberg DE,et al.Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.Spine,2003,28:1148-1157.

共引文献117

同被引文献62

  • 1王亭,邱贵兴.脊柱侧凸后路融合术后的曲轴现象[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(2):124-126. 被引量:7
  • 2邱贵兴,于斌,Norbert Ventura,仉建国,王以朋,翁习生,石志才.特发性脊柱侧凸King、Lenke和PUMC临床分型的应用比较[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(3):145-150. 被引量:13
  • 3李明,顾苏熙,朱晓东,杨继东,张祺,赵永飞,吴大江,王静杰,倪建强,杨晓明,曹洪海.全节段椎弓根螺钉系统矫治青少年特发性胸腰椎/腰椎侧凸的疗效[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(4):261-265. 被引量:15
  • 4邱勇,刘臻,朱锋,王斌,俞杨,朱泽章,钱邦平,马薇薇.Halo-股骨髁上牵引对重度脊柱侧凸后路矫形的影响[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(8):513-516. 被引量:30
  • 5Dai LY,Jin WJ.Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.Spine.2005;30(3):354-358.
  • 6郑新峰 徐韬 郭海龙 等.手工测量特发性脊柱侧凸Cobb角的可靠性评价.中华医学杂志,2010,31(5):343-346.
  • 7Michaela G,Katrin S,Nadja W,et al.Inter-and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle manual versus digital measurement tools.Eur Spine J.2007;16:1587-1592.
  • 8Antonio DC,Raphael V,Laurent T,et al.Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis.Are 30×90 cm plain films better than digitized small films.Eur Spine J.2007;16:1615-1620.
  • 9Timothy RK,Benjamin KP,Michael FO,et al.Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.J Spinal Disord Tech.2005;18(2):152-159.
  • 10Timothy RK,Benjamin KP,David WP,et al.Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.Spine.2005; 30(4):444-454.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部