汉语方位词的词性及其理论意义被引量：16

Chinese localizers:grammatical nature and theoretical significance

导出

摘要本文的主要观点有三:一、方位词是从名词中分离出来的词类,保留了名词的主要句法特征,两者的不同可以用低费用原则来解释。二、方位词的核心成员不是附着语素,而且无论一个方位词是否已经演变成附着语素,都不能解释方位词和名词的区别。三、汉语的"在"是轻介词,与方位词组合,在功能上对应于其他语言里的静态方位介词。 This paper argues that (a) Chinese localizers form a class deviating from nouns, with the similarities and differences determined by the Principle of Economy; (b) treating localizers as clitics, though correct for certain members of the class, fails to provide an explanation for the different syntactic behaviors between localizers and nouns; (c) the locative preposition zai (在) is best analyzed as a light P that takes a localizer phrase as complement.

作者李亚非

机构地区美国威斯康辛大学麦迪逊校区语言学系

出处《中国语文》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期99-109,共11页 Studies of the Chinese Language

关键词方位词名词介词附着语素格低费用原则新词类的分离轻介词 localizer, noun, pre/postposition, clitic, case, the Principle of Economy, categorical deviation, light P

分类号 H146 [语言文字—汉语] H315.9 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1刘丹青.2003.《语序类型学和介词理论》.商务印书馆.
2李亚非.论语言学研究中的分析与综合[J].中国语文,2006(3):195-205. 被引量：10
3Aydemir, Yasemin 2004 Are Turkish preverbal bare nouns syntactic arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 25:465- 474.
4Bech, Gunnar 1952 Uber das niederlandische Adverbialpronomen Er. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 8.
5Bennis, Hans, and Teun Hoekstra 1984 Gaps and parasitic gaps. The Linguistic Review 4:29-87.
6Chomsky, Noam 1970 Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.). Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass. : Girm & Company, 184-221.
7Chomsky, Noam 1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8Ernst, Thomas 1988 Chinese postpositions? - again. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 16:219-245.
9Li, Charles, and Sandra Thompson 1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10Li, Yafei 2005 X: A theory of the Morphology-syntax Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

二级参考文献24

1李亚非.核心移位的本质及其条件──兼论句法和词法的交界面[J].当代语言学,2000,2(1):1-17. 被引量：14
2毛泽东.《矛盾论》[M].,..
3Baker, Mark 1988 Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
4Chomsky, Noam 1970 Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jaeobs and P. Rosenbaum, (eds). Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184-221. Washington D. C: Georgetown University Press.
5Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language. Praeger, New York.
6Collins, Chris 1997 Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Lingusitic Inquiry 28: 461-497.
7Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams 1987 On the Definition of Words. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Fiengo, Robert 1977 On trace theory. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 35-62.
8Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningtul elements. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of Language (Second Edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9Huang, James 1988 Wo Pao De Kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language 64: 274-311.
10Jansen, Bert, Hilda Koopman and Pieter Muysken 1978 Serial verbs in the creole languages. In P. Muysken and N. Smith (eds.). Amsterdam Creole Studies 2: 125-159.