SJR与影响因子、h指数的比较及SJR的扩展设想被引量：46

Comparison of SJR with Journal Impact Factor and H-index

下载PDF

导出

摘要介绍了SCImago Journal Rank(SJR)及其计算过程,使用因子分析、回归及相关分析等方法实证研究了SJR与期刊影响因子、期刊h指数的关系。结果表明:SJR与期刊影响因子和期刊h指数均有较强正相关性;SJR与期刊影响因子的联合判定可区别出期刊在流行与声望两个维度上的特点;SJR和期刊引文及参考文献的平均性指标具有较强内部关联性,而期刊h指数则与总体性指标内部关联较强。提出了标准化SJR用于解决SJR不能跨学科比较的问题,提出了期刊声望演化指数用于衡量期刊声望的演变趋势,并将SJR的运用范围扩展到了学科和国家层次。 SCImago Journal Rank （S JR）and its determination are introduced. We have empirically analyzed the relationship between SJR and journal Impact Factor, h-index by the factor analysis, regression and correlation analysis. The results show that SJR has a significant positive correlation with journal impact factor and h-index. Combining SJR and journal impact factor, we can distinguish between journal＇s popularity and prestige characteristics. In addition, a strong internal relationship between S JR and the average indices of journal citation and reference has been found,and journal＇s h-index has strong internal relationship with overall indices. Further, standardized SJR （SSJR） and Journal Prestige Evolution （JPE） have been presented, which can be used to compare journals of different subjects and to analyze the trend in evolution of journal reputation. Moreover, application scope of SJR can be extended to the discipline and state level.

作者赵星高小强唐宇

机构地区重庆大学经济与工商管理学院

出处《大学图书馆学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期80-84,共5页 Journal of Academic Libraries

关键词 SJR 科学计量引文分析 SJR Scientometries Citation Analysis

分类号 G350 [文化科学—情报学] F830.91 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1Butler D. Free journal - ranking tool enters citation market. Nature, 2008,451 (7174) :6.
2Garfield E. Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 1955,122 ( 3159 ) : 108 - 111.
3Braun T et al. A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics,2006, 69(1) ,169 - 173..
4SCImago. Description of scimago journal rank indicator. [ 2008 - 2 - 26 ]. http ://www. scimagojr.com.
5Strogatz SH. Exploring complex networks. Nature, 2001,410 (6825) : 268 - 276.
6van Leeuwen et al. Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics ,2001,51 ( 1 ) :335 - 346.
7Agrawal a. Corruption of journal impact factors. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution,2005,20(4) :157.
8Hirsch J. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(46 ) : 16569 - 16572.
9Ball P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature, 2005,436 (7053) :900.
10Ball P. Achievement index climbs the ranks. Nature, 2007,448(7155) :737.

二级参考文献15

1姜春林,刘则渊,梁永霞.H指数和G指数——期刊学术影响力评价的新指标[J].图书情报工作,2006,50(12):63-65. 被引量：103
2[1]Hirsch,J.E.An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA,2005,102(46):16569-16572.[2007-03-15].http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/102/46/16569
3[2]Ball,P.Index to aims for fair ranking of scientists.Nature,2005,436(7053):900
4[3]Braun,T.et al.A Hirsch-type index for journals.The Scientist,2005,19(22):8
5[4]Glānzel,W.On the h-index-a mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact.Scientometrics,2006,67(2):315-321
6[5]Egghe,L.,Rousseau,R.An informetric model for the Hirschindex.Scientometrics,2006,69(1):121-129
7[6]Egghe,L.Dynamic h-index:the hirsch index in function of time.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2007,58(3):452-454
8[7]Egghe,L.Theory and practice of the g-index.Scientometrics,2006,69(1):131-152
9[8]Bornmann,L.and H.D.Daniel.Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics,2005,65(3):391-392
10[9]Batista,P.D.et al.Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics,2006,68 (1):179 -189