PPH术与传统手术治疗痔的临床分析

Clinical Analysis of Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids and Milligan-Morgan Haemorrhoidectomy

目的:了解痔的发病情况,及施行传统手术或PPH术两种不同术式的住院费用和住院天数比较。方法:对177例传统手术和249例PPH术患者按年龄、住院天数、费用分组、是否存在合并症等方面进行分析。结果:在住院费用方面,传统手术组显著低于PPH组(t=-3.564,P=0.0004);在住院天数方面,传统手术组显著高于PPH组(t=3.239,P=0.001)。结论:60岁以下患者以及合并肛管和肛周疾病的痔患者,经济许可的情况下,我们建议行PPH术。

Objective： To contrast the hospital fees and the hospital stay between the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （ PPH） and Milligan -Morgan haemorrhoidectomy（ MM ）, as to learning about the incidence of hemorrhoids. Method ： 177 patients received MM and 249 patients received PPH. Analysis evaluated between the ages, the hospital fees ,the hospital stay and the complications. Result：The MM were lower than the PPH in the hospital fees （ t = - 3. 564, P = 0.0004 ） as longer in the hospital stay （ t = 3. 239, P = 0. 001 ）. Conclusion： We suggested the patients who were younger than 60 and which complicated with perianal and canal disease to choose PPH in the economic permissing conditions.