摘要
目的:了解痔的发病情况,及施行传统手术或PPH术两种不同术式的住院费用和住院天数比较。方法:对177例传统手术和249例PPH术患者按年龄、住院天数、费用分组、是否存在合并症等方面进行分析。结果:在住院费用方面,传统手术组显著低于PPH组(t=-3.564,P=0.0004);在住院天数方面,传统手术组显著高于PPH组(t=3.239,P=0.001)。结论:60岁以下患者以及合并肛管和肛周疾病的痔患者,经济许可的情况下,我们建议行PPH术。
Objective: To contrast the hospital fees and the hospital stay between the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids ( PPH) and Milligan -Morgan haemorrhoidectomy( MM ), as to learning about the incidence of hemorrhoids. Method : 177 patients received MM and 249 patients received PPH. Analysis evaluated between the ages, the hospital fees ,the hospital stay and the complications. Result:The MM were lower than the PPH in the hospital fees ( t = - 3. 564, P = 0.0004 ) as longer in the hospital stay ( t = 3. 239, P = 0. 001 ). Conclusion: We suggested the patients who were younger than 60 and which complicated with perianal and canal disease to choose PPH in the economic permissing conditions.
出处
《河北医学》
CAS
2009年第3期269-272,共4页
Hebei Medicine
关键词
痔
PPH
住院费用
住院天数
Hemorrhoids
Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids
Hospital fees
Hospital stay