期刊文献+

批判实在论与马克思主义哲学的主要区别 被引量:2

The Differences between Critical Realism and Marxist Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 批判实在论的一个重要发展方向就是自觉地与马克思主义密切联系起来,并认为自己在很多方面是对马克思主义的丰富和发展。事实上二者有很多本质区别,这些主要区别可以从本体论、认识论、辩证法和价值论四个领域分别加以澄清。 One obvious trend of the critical realism is to relate itself to Marxism in many aspects. However, there are many differences between the Critical realism and Marxism. The differences can be clarified in the main areas of philosophy, such as ontology, epistemology, dialectics, and axiology.
作者 吴畏
出处 《北京行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期42-46,共5页 Journal of Beijing administration institute
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(06JA720010)
关键词 批判实在论 马克思主义哲学 巴斯卡 critical realism Marxism Bhaskar
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1ROY BHASKAR. From science to emancipation: alienation and the actuality of Enlightenment [M]. London: Sage Publications, 2002.
  • 2BHASKAR ROY. The realist theory of science[M]. London: Verso, 1979.
  • 3MARGARET ARCHER, ROY BHASKAR, et al (eds). Critical realism:essential readings [M].London and New York: Routledge, 1998.
  • 4JOHN M. ROBERTS. Marxism and critical realism:the same, similar and just plain different [J]. Capital & Class, 1999(6S).
  • 5ANDREW SAYER. Abstraction: a realist interpretation[J]. Radical Philosophy, 1981: 6-15.
  • 6ROY BHASKAR. Dialectic:the pulse of freedom? [M]. London: Verso, 1993.
  • 7SEAN CREAVEN. The pulse of freedom? Bhaskar's dialectic and marxism[J].Historical Materialism, 2002(10):2.
  • 8ANDREW COLLIER. Dialectic in Marxism and critical realism[C]//ANDREW BROWN etc. eds.Critical realism and marxism. London and New York: Routledge, 2000:155-167.
  • 9PETER BERGER & THOMAS LUCKMANN. The social construction of reality[M].London: Penguin, 1967:17.
  • 10TONY TANT. Marxism as social science [C]// ANDREW GAMBLE,DAVID MARSH and TONY TANT (eds). Marxism and social science. Hampshire:Macmillan, 1999: 114.

二级参考文献20

  • 1M邦格.科学的唯物主义[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1989.27.
  • 2Jeffrey Goldstein. Emergence as a Construct:History and Issues[J]. Emergence: Complexity and Management, Voll, 1999.287.
  • 3Jeffrey Goldstein. Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues[J], Emergence: Complexity and Management, Voll, 1999.289.
  • 4Lewes, G H Problems of Life and Mind [M]. Vo12 London: KeganPaul, Trench, Turbner, 1857.
  • 5Crutchfield. Is Anything Ever New? Consider Emergence[J]. State Fe Institute Working Paper # 94-03-011,1994.
  • 6Mark Bedau. Downward Causation and the Autonomy of Weak Emergence [ S]. The International Directory of on Line Philosophy Papers, 2002.5 - 50.
  • 7Achim Stephan. Emergentism, Irreducibility and Downward Causation[J ]. Grazer Philosophische Studien. 2002.77 - 93.
  • 8M·邦格.科学的唯物主义[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1989.27.
  • 9D. T. Campbell,. Downward Causation [A]. Hierarchically Organized Biological Systemes. In Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, F. J. Ayala & T. Dobzhansky ( ed. ) Macillan Press. 1974. 176.
  • 10J. Kim. Supervenience and mind[A], Cambridge University Press, in Claus Emmeche et al. Levels, Emergence and Three Versions of Downward Causation.

共引文献22

同被引文献20

  • 1殷杰.社会科学哲学的论域[J].科学技术与辩证法,2006,23(3):71-75. 被引量:5
  • 2马克思.资本论:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1976.
  • 3Little, Daniel. Scientific Marx[M]. Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press, 1986.
  • 4Farr,J. Michael. Marx and Positivism[C]//After Marx. T. Ball and J. Farr. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press 1984: 233.
  • 5Walker, David M. Marx, Methodology and Science[[M]. England : Ashgate, 2001.
  • 6Collier, Andrew. Critical Realism : An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar's Philosophy[M]. London : Verso, 1994: ix.
  • 7Hacking, Ian. Representing and intervening : Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science[M]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1983 : 21.
  • 8庄锦农 魏中平.解释与批判;论批判实存论的科学解释观.政治科学论丛,1998,(9):121-144.
  • 9亨普尔.定律及其在科学说明中的地位[C]//蒋劲松,刘兵.科学哲学读本.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:124-144.
  • 10Bhaskar, Roy. Reclaiming Reality : A Critical Introduction Contemporary Philosophy[M]. London: Verso, 1989 :5.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部