期刊文献+

3~12岁手术患儿在麻醉复苏室的心理干预 被引量:5

Psychological intervention for 3-12 years old children in post-anesthctic ICU
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨患儿在麻醉复苏室(PACU)进行心理干预的必要性和可行性,为临床实施心理干预提供依据。方法将240例手术患儿分为两组:3~6岁组、6~12岁组,再根据是否给予心理干预随机分为实验组和对照组(各60例),观察并记录在PACU的情绪、精神状况、与医务人员的配合程度和在PACU的恐惧感以及患儿术前与出PACU的血压、脉搏的变化。结果实验组与对照组相比较,实验组在PACU较安静,与医务人员配合的程度高,术前与出PACU的血压、脉搏变化小且术后恐惧感消失较快。结论对手术患儿在PACU进行心理干预可明显缓解患儿的紧张、恐惧程度,能较好地配合医务人员的工作,为安全、顺利地度过麻醉恢复期,预防并发症的发生创造良好的条件。 Objective To explore the necessity and feasibility of the psychological intervention for children in post-anesthetic ICU (PACU) and to provide evidence for the clinical psychological intervention. Methods Totally 240 children patients were divided into 3-6 years group and 6- 12 years group. Each group was further divided into experiment subgroup (n = 60) and control one (n= 60). The blood pressure, pulse, emotion, mental state, fear and the coordination with the medical staff in and out of PACU in each group were observed. Results The children in ex- periment subgroup were very quiet without fear and could act well with the medical staff. The pulse and blood pressure of the children in experimental subgroup kept stable. Conclusion Psychological intervention is a good way to calm down the children and release the complication. The children may pass through the anesthesia recovery stage easily by this way.
作者 张晶洁
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2009年第7期483-485,共3页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 心理干预 麻醉复苏室 儿童 psychological intervention post-anesthctic ICU children
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献9

共引文献105

同被引文献25

  • 1李秀梅,戴红霞,曾秀玲.小儿气管内插管麻醉复苏期并发症的观察及护理[J].现代医院,2006,6(2):70-71. 被引量:7
  • 2王玉霞.小儿氯胺酮复合麻醉围麻醉期的护理[J].河南外科学杂志,2010,16(3):118-120.
  • 3钱娟芳.全麻术后早期呼吸异常的原因分析及护理对策[J].护理与康复,2008,7(1):43-45. 被引量:14
  • 4Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(250):81-104.
  • 5Novikov KI, Subramanyam KN, Muradisinov SO, et al Cosmetic lower limb lengthening by Ilizarov apparatus: what are the risks? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;47201 ):3549-3556.
  • 6Barker KL, Lamb SE, Simpson HR. Recovery of muscle strength and power after limb-lengthening surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3): 384-388.
  • 7Paley D, Lamm BM, Katsenis D, et al. Treatment of malunion and nonunion at the site of an ankle fusion with the Ilizarov apparatus. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:119-134.
  • 8Park YE, Song SH, Kwon HN, et al. Gradual correction of idiopathic genu varum deformity using the Ilizarov technique Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21 (7): 1523-1529.
  • 9Goldstein R~, Jordan C J, McLaurin TM, et al. The evolution of the Ilizarov technique: part 2: the principles of distraction osteosynthesis. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71(1):96-103.
  • 10Krishnan A, Pamecha C, Patwa JJ. Modified Ilizarov technique for infected nonunion of the femur: the principle of distraction-compression osteogenesis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006;14(3):265-272.

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部