期刊文献+

两种方法检测乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原的比较 被引量:18

Comparison of two methods in detecting HBsAg
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对胶体金免疫层析(GICA)法与酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)法检测乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原(HBsAg)进行比较。方法采用两种方法检测18~65岁人群血清标本4086份。结果GICA法检测出HBsAg阳性标本327份,阳性率为8.0%;ELISA法检测出阳性标本391份,阳性率为9.6%;GICA法与ELISA法检测标本符合率为98.43%。结论GICA法操作简便、快速,检测的特异度较好,但其灵敏度有限,ELISA法更适合医院、血站的检测应用。 Objective To compare gold immunochromatography assay (GICA) with enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in detecting HBsAg. Methods GICA and ELISA were used to detect HBsAg in serum from 4 086 individuals aged from 18 to 65 years. Results A total of 327 samples (8.0%) were HBsAg positive when detected by GICA, while 391 cases (9.6%) showed positive when detected by ELISA; the positive coincidence rate was 98.43%. Conclusion Although GICA is simpler and faster than ELISA, and has a good specificity, its sensibili- ty is still dissatisfactory. By comparison, ELISA is more suitable for serum HBsAg detection in hospitals and blood centres.
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2009年第7期495-496,共2页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 胶体金免疫层析法 酶联免疫吸附试验 乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原 gold colloid immunochromatographic assay enzyme linked immunosorbent assay HBsAg
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

共引文献98

同被引文献154

引证文献18

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部