期刊文献+

大兴安岭南部春季火行为特征及可燃物消耗 被引量:21

Fire Behavior and Consumption of Fuel Loadings in Spring Season in Southern Daxing'an Mountains
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用标准地调查分析2007年春季大兴安岭2起森林火灾的火行为及可燃物变化。采用加拿大火险天气指数(FWI)系统分析火险变化,地表可燃物载量调查采用线状相交可燃物调查方法,并利用MODIS遥感数据对火烧程度进行分级。结果表明:FWI系统各指标可以很好地指示森林火险变化,2007年4—5月细小可燃物湿度码(FFMC)基本都在90以上,腐殖质湿度码(DMC)和干旱指数(DC)在4月份持续升高,2场大火也发生在火险高的时段。火烧类型以地表火为主,部分林分有冲冠火。火后阔叶林地表径级可燃物增加不明显,针阔混交林主要是5.0~6.99cm径级可燃物增加,而落叶松纯林火烧后除0.50~0.99cm径级可燃物减少外,其他径级可燃物都明显增加。不同火烧程度对地表可燃物载量的影响有差异。中度和重度火烧后草本盖度明显下降,有些林分下木层死亡率较高。罕诺河火场和松岭区壮志林场过火区重度火烧分别占33.2%和46.4%。 Fire behavior and fuel loading changes were investigated in plots of two burned, occurred in spring of 2007, slashes in Daxing'an Mountains. We used Canadian fire weather index (FWI) system to analysis fire danger changes in that period. A linear intersect method was used for assessing ground fuel loadings and the MODIS satellite data were used for burn classification. The results indicated that the indexes of FWI system were a good indicator for fire danger rating in Daxing' an Mountains. Most fine fuel moisture codes (FFMC) were more than 90 during April and May of 2007, and duff moisture code (DMC) and drought code (DC) were rising continually in April. The two fires occurred in high fire danger period. In Danxing' an Mountains most fires were surface fire, and some areas had torching fire. For broadleaf forests ground diameter fuels didn't increase significantly after fire, but all diameter fuels increased in coniferous and broadleaf mixed forests except 5.0 - 6.99 cm diameter fuels. Fire intensity had an influence on ground fuel loadings. After the fire with modest and high fire intensity the grass coverage decreased significantly and had a high mortality rate of understory. The areas with high fire intensity of the two fires were accounted for 33.2% and 46.4% of the burned-area respectively.
出处 《林业科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期90-95,共6页 Scientia Silvae Sinicae
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30671695)
关键词 可燃物消耗 森林火险 火行为 大兴安岭 consumed fuel forest fire danger rating fire behavior Daxing' an Mountains
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1张家来,曾祥福,胡仁华,漆荣,王少元,辜忠春,邓先珍,薛家翠,熊艳平,宋政清,李爱华,鲁黎.湖北主要森林可燃物类型及潜在火行为研究[J].华中农业大学学报,2002,21(6):550-554. 被引量:33
  • 2郭平,康春莉,田卫,李军,周道玮.草地可燃物床特性与草地火行为的关系[J].干旱区研究,2002,19(4):13-16. 被引量:6
  • 3Allison E C, Peter Z F, Joseph E C. 2005. Comparison of bum severity assessments using differenced normalized bum ratio and data. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 14:189- 198.
  • 4Amiro B D, Todd J B, Wotton B M, et al. 2001. Direct carbon emissions from Canadian forest fires, 1959 to 1999. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31:512 - 525.
  • 5Gregoire T G, Valentine H T. 2003. Line intersect sampling: ell-shaped transects and multiple intersections. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10: 263- 279.
  • 6IPCC. 2001. Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change//Houghton J T, Ding Y, Gfiggs D J, et al. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 881.
  • 7Ringvall A, Stahl G. 1999. Field aspects of line intersect sampling for assessing coarse woody debris. Forest Ecology and Management, 119: 163- 170.
  • 8Warren W G. 1990. Line intersect sampling: an historical perspective// LaBau V J, Cunia T. State-of-the-Art Methodology of Forest Inventories: A Symposium Proceedings. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-263, 33 - 38.

二级参考文献5

  • 1郎奎健 唐守正.IBMPC系列程序集[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1989.164-476.
  • 2周道玮.草原防火[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1996.1-3.
  • 3奥德姆 孙儒泳(译).生态学基础[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1981..
  • 4张家来,曾祥福,漆荣,刘学全,王应绍.九峰森林防火林带设计[J].湖北林业科技,1999(4):10-11. 被引量:3
  • 5张家来,曾祥福,刘学全,漆荣,邓先珍,熊艳平,鲁水清,陈志新,薛家翠.湖北森林防火树种选择的研究[J].华中农业大学学报,2000,19(1):84-90. 被引量:36

共引文献37

同被引文献348

引证文献21

二级引证文献208

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部