国际投资中的间接征收及其认定被引量：20

The Indirect Takings and Their Determination in International Investment

下载PDF

导出

摘要国际投资中的间接征收认定向来是理论难点,并直接影响到投资者和东道国的切身利益。传统的理论模式从分析经济利益着手来确定间接征收的构成要件,均存在难以弥补的缺陷。从补偿的功能出发来界定间接征收在理论上不失为一个良好的替代方案,而且也具有很强的可操作性。但是,以补偿为中心的分析思路将赋予裁判者以较大的自由裁量权,为此,有必要对间接征收进行类型化限制。 How to determine the existence of indirect takings in international investment is always one of the most difficult parts of theory,which directly affects the interests of investors and host nations.Traditional theories start from analyzing the economic interests to determine the constructive condition of the indirect takings,and ends with fatal defects.The theory of defining indirect takings from the perspective of compensation＇s function is a better alternative,and is much more manageable.As the compensation-centered analyzing approach leaves wide latitude for the judge or arbitrator,it is necessary to categorize the indirect takings against the abusing of power.

作者彭岳

机构地区复旦大学法学院

出处《复旦学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期64-72,共9页 Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

关键词间接征收质差模式量差模式竞争模式补偿的功能 indirect takings model of quality-backed distinction model of quantity-backed distinction competition-backed distinctin function of compensation

分类号 D996.4 [政治法律—经济法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献45

1Article 2(c) of the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1974.
2OECD Working Papers on International Investment No. 2004/4, "Indirect Expropriation" and "The Right to Regulate" in International Investment Law, footnote 1, September 2004.
3Rudolf Dolzer, “Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?” 11 N. Y. U. Environmental L. J. 66.
4William Michael Treanor, "The Original Understanding of the Takings Clause and the Political Process," 95 Colum. L. Rev. 782 (1995).
5William Michael Treanor, "The Origins and Original Significance of the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment," 94 Yale L. J. 694.
6National Mut. Ins. Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co., 337 U.S. 582 (1949).
7Charles A. Reich, "The New Property", 73 Yale L. J. 733.
8陶信平,刘志仁.论网络虚拟财产的法律保护[J].政治与法律,2007(4):96-100. 被引量：28
9房秋实.浅析网络虚拟财产[J].法学评论,2006,24(2):73-77. 被引量：58
10Joseph L. Sax, "Takings and the Police Power," 74 Yale L. J. 47.

二级参考文献36

1夏玲利.浅议网络游戏中虚拟财产的民法保护[J].浙江教育学院学报,2005(2):100-103. 被引量：11
2张乃根.国家股为何难以上市交易？[J].探索与争鸣,1994(2):14-16. 被引量：1
3[1]Michael G.Parisi,Moving Toward Transparency? An Examination of Regulatory Taking[J].Emory International Law Review,Vol.19 (2005),p.388.
4[2]W.Michael Reisman & Robert D.Sloane,Indirect Expropriation and Its Valuation in the BIT Generation[J].The British Year Book of International Law,2003,p.116.
5[3]Rainer Geiger,Regulatory Expropriations in International Law:Lessons from the Multilateral Agreement on Investment[J].New York University Environmental Law Journal,Vol.11(2002),p.107.
6[4][14]Bjorn Kunoy,Developments in Indirect Expropriation Case Law in ICSID Transnational Arbitration[J].The Journal of World Investment & Trade,Vol.6(2005),p.472.
7[6][23][26]L.Yves Fortier & Stephen L.Drymer,Indirect Expropriation in the Law of International Investment:I Know It When I See It,or Caveat Investor[J].ICSID Review,Vol.19(2004),p.313 ;314 ;315.
8[8][11]Rudolf Dolzer,Indirect Expropriation of Alien Property[J],ICSID Review,Vol.1 (1986),p.55 ;56.
9[9][10][13][21] Rudolf Dolzer,Indirect Expropriation:New Development?[J].New York University Environmental Law Journal,Vol.11 (2002),p.79; 80 ;90 ;78-79.
10[12]Richard Hecklinger,Opening Remark at "Making the Most of Investment Agreements" (coorganized by OECE,ICSID and UNCTAD[R].12 December 2005,Paris.