摘要
针对2001年"泸州遗赠案"的判决,至今仍然为人们所争论。在有明确有效的法律规则存在时,是优先适用法律原则还是适用法律规则乃焦点所在。论文就案件判决的论证不足分别从理论角度与实证角度加以分析,认为在此种情况下,若要优先适用法律原则需符合严格条件,应当通过法益衡量来决定优先适用问题,使判决论证具有正当性和可接受性。
Up to now,the verdict on 2001 Luzhou bequeathal case has still been argued. When there exists the definite and valid legal rule, focus is on the priority over legal principle or legal rule. The paper analyzes the verdict' s deficiency in the perspective of theroy and reality. Then it concludes the priority depends on the balance of legal interest through strict conditions. The argument must have justification and acceptability.
出处
《内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版)》
2009年第1期99-102,共4页
Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University:Social Sciences
基金
上海市重点学科建设项目资助
项目编号:B102
关键词
法律原则
法律规则
法益衡量
可接受性
Legal principle
Legal rule
The balance of legal interest
Acceptability