期刊文献+

儒家人伦之“道”、道家自然之“道”与中国古代文论 被引量:2

"Tao" of Confucian's Human Relationships and"Tao" of Taoistic Nature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 道,是中国先秦一个极其重要的范畴,蕴含着古人丰富的思想,并成为中国古代文论的逻辑起点。道的原始意义是"道路",在老子、孔子的时代被引申、转型为"道理"之类的意义。但老子道家之"道"和孔子儒家之"道"有着明显的差别,相对而言,前者更侧重于"自然"之道;后者更侧重于"人伦"之道。两种不同内涵的"道",在中国古代文论中都有明显的反映。 As an extremely important category in the Pre - Qin Period, Tao containing luxuriant thought of the ancient becomes the logical starting point of Chinese ancient literature theory. Tao' s primitive significance is "Road", but it was expanded and transformed into "principle" and the similar significance in the times of Lao Zi and Kong Zi. There are obvious differences between Lao Zi'" Tao" and Kong Zi'"Tao". The former stresses on "nature", and the latter stresses on "human ethic". From the two quite different "Tan"s, thereis obvious reflection in Chinese ancient literature theory.
作者 刘占祥
出处 《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期111-116,共6页 Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 自然之道:人伦之道 Tao Nature' s Tao The standards of human relationships
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1方述鑫.甲骨金文字典[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979.
  • 2阮元.十三经注疏[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
  • 3段玉裁.说文解字注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981..
  • 4王先慎.韩非子集解[Z].诸子集成本.北京:中华书局,1954.
  • 5蔡元培.中国伦理学史[M].上海;上海古籍出版社,2005:117-120.
  • 6王弼.老五道德经注[M].四部要籍注疏丛刊本.北京:中华书局,1998.
  • 7老子道,德经注,胡适.中国哲学史大纲[M].北京:东方出版社,1996.
  • 8陈鼓应.老子今注今译[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • 9范文澜.文心雕龙注:上册[M].北京:人民文学出版社.1958.
  • 10古文观止今译[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1983.

共引文献972

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部