期刊文献+

云南元谋干热河谷区旱坡地不同生态农业模式土壤水分差异性分析 被引量:7

Variability in soil moisture under four eco-agricultural models on dry slope land in Yuanmou dry-hot valley
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对干热河谷旱坡地Ⅰ(罗望子+木豆),Ⅱ(罗望子+木豆+柱花草),Ⅲ(罗望子+象草),Ⅳ(罗望子+自然草被)等4种复合生态农业模式0-40 cm土层水分进行监测和分析的结果表明:4种模式的土壤含水量主要受自然降水的影响,雨季和旱季差异显著;不同模式对土壤含水量的影响存在差异,其中,模式Ⅱ和模式Ⅳ有较强的保水持水能力;在雨水补给不足时,模式Ⅲ对土壤水分的利用效率最高,模式Ⅳ最低;土壤水分季节波动模式Ⅳ最小,模式Ⅲ波动最剧烈;雨季,4种模式具良好的层间补水能力,旱季,模式Ⅰ和Ⅱ土层间补水能力最强。总体上看,4种模式对干热河谷旱坡地的土壤水分均有一定的保持能力,但模式Ⅱ的保水持水能力最强,综合效益最好,更利于干热河谷旱坡地生态农业的可持续发展。 The analysis was made of soil moisture in the 0~40 cm soil profile under four eco-agricultural models on dry slope land in a dry-hot valley.The results showed that soil moisture content was influenced mostly by precipitation,and it had conspicuous difference between rainy and dry seasons.Soil moisture content varied under different modles.Model Ⅱ and Ⅳ had strong water-holding power,while model Ⅲ had the topmost water use efficiency when the precipitation was lack,but model Ⅳ's was the lowest.The seasonal fluctuate on soil moisture of the model Ⅳ was the lowest,but model Ⅲ's was the highest.In rainy season,four models had good water supply ability between soil layers.In dry season,model Ⅱ and Ⅰ had only good water supply ability between soil layers.As the whole,four models had part water-holding power,but model Ⅱ was the best one on synthetical benefit,it will make development on eco-agriculture in the dry-hot valley.
出处 《干旱地区农业研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期248-252,共5页 Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目(2006BAC01A11) 云南省基金项目(2006D0092M)
关键词 生态农业 土壤水分 旱坡地 干热河谷 元谋 云南 eco-agriculture soil moisture dry slope land dry-hot valley Yuanmou Yunnan
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献241

共引文献1116

同被引文献143

引证文献7

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部