期刊文献+

非平衡等离子体消除乙硫醇 被引量:1

Removal of ethanethiol by nonequilibrium plasma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用脉冲电晕放电等离子体对乙硫醇进行消除实验,探索了气体流量(停留时间)、气流中水分含量对消除率的影响规律。结果表明,随着气体流量的增大,乙硫醇在反应器内的停留时间减小,能量密度减小,消除率降低;消除率随水分含量的变化并非呈单方向增大或减小,而是存在一个最佳范围,从实验结果来看,水分含量为3.2~3.5g/m3,消除率明显高于水分含量低于3.2g/m3或高于3.5g/m3时的消除率。采用GC-MS、FTIR和SGA94-SO2型单项气体分析仪等仪器对乙硫醇的消除产物进行了分析,主要产物为CO2、H2O和SO2,未检测到有机产物。根据实验数据分析了乙硫醇的反应动力学特征,发现乙硫醇在脉冲电晕等离子体体系中的反应符合一级反应动力学特征,反应速率常数为0.0729s-1。 Pulsed corona discharge plasma was used to treat ethanethiol in the air. The influences of gas flow rate (or residence time) and moisture of gas flow on removal efficiency were investigated. As a result, the removal efficiency decreased obviously with increasing gas flow rate, because both the residence time of ethanethiol in plasma reactor and energy density decreased. While the variation of removal efficiency with moisture on removal efficiency was not increasing or decreasing unilaterally, and the maximal removal efficiency could be obtained in a range of moisture. The removal efficiency in the moisture range of 3.2-3.5 g/m^3 was obviously higher than that at a moisture of less than 3.2 g/m^3 or more than 3.5 g/m^3 according to experimental data. The products of ethanethiol reaction were mainly CO2, H2O and SO2 analyzed by GC-MS, FTIR and SGA94-SO2 Single Gas Analyzer, but no organic product was found. According to analyzing the reaction kinetic characteristics of ethanethiol based on experimental data, it was found that the reaction of ethanethiol in pulsed corona plasma system followed the first order reaction, with the reaction rate constant of 0.0729 s^-1.
机构地区 防化研究院
出处 《化工进展》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期698-702,共5页 Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(国家863计划)项目(2007AA06A408)
关键词 非平衡等离子体 脉冲电晕放电 消除乙硫醇 反应动力学 non-equilibrium plasma pulsed corona discharge removal of ethanethiol reaction kinetics
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献95

共引文献60

同被引文献13

  • 1李战国,胡真,孙小亮,李颖,饶刚.等离子体技术在化学毒剂洗消中的研究进展[J].化工进展,2007,26(2):204-206. 被引量:4
  • 2沈燕,黄丽,张仁熙,侯惠奇.介质阻挡放电降解SF_6的研究[J].环境化学,2007,26(3):275-279. 被引量:12
  • 3Pearson G S, Magee R S. Critical evaluation of proven chemical weapon destruction technology (IUPAC Technical Report)[J]. Pure Appl Chem,2002, 74(2): 187-316.
  • 4Bailin L J, Sibert M E, Jonas L A, et al. Microwave decomposition of toxic vapor simulants[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1975, 9: 254-258.
  • 5Hong Y C, Kim J H, Uhm H S. Simulated experiment for elimination of chemical and biological warfare agents by making use of microwave plasma torch[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2004, 11(2): 830-835.
  • 6Uhm H S, Lee H Y, Hong Y C, et al. A decontamination study of simulated chemical and biological agents[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 102 (1): No. 013303.
  • 7Mok Y S, Nam C M, Cho M H. Decomposition of volatile organic compounds and nitric oxide by non thermal plasma discharge process[J]. IEEE Transaction on Plasma Science, 2002, 30(1): 408-415.
  • 8Sun W, Pashaie B, Dhali S K. Non-thermal plasma remediation of SO2/NO using a dielectric-barrier discharge[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1996, 79: 3438-3444.
  • 9Koutsospyros A D, Yin S M, Christodoulatos C, et al. Plasma chemical degradation of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in a capillary discharge plasma reactor[J]. IEEE Transaction on Plasma Science, 2005, 33(1): 42-49.
  • 10史喜成,李静,白书培,韩素玲,宋华,王德生.单双介质阻挡放电降解苯的对比研究[J].环境化学,2009,28(2):196-201. 被引量:6

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部