期刊文献+

五所医院住院病例死亡率的比较分析 被引量:2

Comparison analysis on inpatient mortality rate in 5 hospitals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用"中国医疗质量指标体系(CHQIS)"中部分住院病例死亡指标,对北京市五所大型综合医院的医疗质量进行了比较分析。结果表明,CHQIS的患者死亡指标可以在不同角度、不同层次对住院病例死亡情况进行分析。同时采用多家医院横向比较的方法,结合CHQIS的死亡率指标分析结果,可以比较准确地评价各个医院特定的医疗质量问题。 This study makes use of inpatient mortality in CHQIS, and eonduets comparative analysis of health quality of five large general hospitals in Beijing. The results indicate that the inpatient mortality can analyze the inpatient mortality status of different levels from different perspectives. The study applies transverse comparison of multi-hospitals, with reference to the outcomes of analysis with mortality indicators in CHQIS. Thus, it can evaluate health quality prohlems of eaeh hospital more accurately.
机构地区 北京大学医学部
出处 《中国医院》 2009年第4期10-13,共4页 Chinese Hospitals
关键词 住院病例死亡 医疗质量 死亡率 评价指标 inpatient mortality, medical quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1马谢民.国际医疗质量指标体系及其特点[J].中国医院管理,2007,27(11):22-24. 被引量:63
  • 2Brennan T A, Leape L I,, Laird N M. et a l. Incident of adverse events and negligence inhospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical Practice Study I[ J] . N Engt J Med, 1991, 324: 370-376.
  • 3Leape L L. Brennan T A, Laird N M, et al. The nalure of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical Practice Study 1[ J] . N Engl J Med, 1991, 324: 377- 384.

二级参考文献4

  • 1Brennan T A, Leape L L, Laird N M, et al. Incident of adverse events and negligence in-hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical Practice Study I[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991, 324: 370- 376.
  • 2Leape L L, Brennan T A, Laird N M, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical Practice Study I[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991, 324: 377-384.
  • 3Wilson R M, Runciman W B, Gibberd R W, et al. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study [J]. Medical Journal of Australia, 1995, 163(1): 458-471.
  • 4Cantrill J A, Sibbald B, Buetow S. Indicators of the appropriateness of long term prescribing in general praetiee in the United Kingdom: Consensus development, face and eontent validity, feasibility and reliability[J]. Quality in Health Care, 1998(7): 130-135.

共引文献62

同被引文献33

引证文献2

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部