期刊文献+

连锁董事关系网络对企业绩效影响研究 被引量:13

The Effect of Interlocking Directorate Network on Firm Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章在对以西方连锁董事实践为背景而构建的资源依赖理论和阶层领导理论进行分析的基础上,结合中国现实情境提出连锁董事关系网络对企业绩效影响的相关假说,并借助于社会网络和社会统计分析工具进行实证检验。结果发现基于资源依赖理论和阶层领导理论提出的相关假说中,度中心性、居中中心性、核心——边缘对企业绩效的影响不显著;基于资源依赖理论提出的地域趋同性对企业绩效有显著正向影响,行业趋同性对企业绩效的影响不显著。说明资源依赖理论对我国连锁董事实践具有一定解释力,并且基于地域趋同性而建立的连锁董事关系网络有利于企业资源获取和经营绩效的改善。这一研究结果对于规范中国企业连锁董事行为具有重要的理论与现实意义。 Based on the resource dependence theory and class hegemony theory originated from western interlocking directorates practice, we give related propositions of the effect of interlocking directorates on firm performance in China. The results show that among the propositions based on the resource dependence theory and the class hegemony theory, degree centrality, betweenness centrality and coreperiphery have no significant influence on firm performance; regional convergence has a positive influence while industrial convergence has on significant influence. So the resource dependence theory is applicable in China and the interlocking directorate network based on the regional convergence is helpful for companies to obtain resource and improve performance.
作者 段海艳
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期38-44,共7页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金(70872088) 教育部博士点基金(200806980052)
关键词 连锁董事 社会网络 中心性 企业绩效 interlocking directorates social network centrality firm performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1RAFAEL LIZA SANTOS, ALEXANDRE DI MICELI DA SILVEIRA. Board Interlocking in Brazil: Directors' participation in Multiple Companies and its Effect on Firm Value[EB/OL]. [2007-10-03]. http:/www. ssrn. com.
  • 2彭正银,廖天野.连锁董事治理效应的实证分析--基于内在机理视角的探讨[J].南开管理评论,2008,11(1):99-105. 被引量:67
  • 3RICHARDSON R J. Directorship Interlocks and Corporate Profitability[J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987(32): 367-386.
  • 4RSEEM M . Classwide Rationality in the Politics of Managers and Directors of Large Corporations in the United States and Great Britain [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982 (27): 199-226.
  • 5MIZRUCHI M S. Who Controls Whom? An Examination of the Relation between Management and Boards of Directors in Large Ameri- can Corporations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1983(8): 426-435.
  • 6ALDRICH HOWARD. Organizations and Environments[M]. Englewood Cliffs . NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979: 5-9.
  • 7BURT R S. Cooptative Corporate Actor Networks: A Reconsideration of Interlocking Directorates Involving American Manufacturing [J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980(25): 557-581.
  • 8任兵,区玉辉,彭维刚.连锁董事与公司绩效:针对中国的研究[J].南开管理评论,2007,10(1):8-15. 被引量:72
  • 9ELIEZER M FICH, ANIL SHIVDASANI. Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2006, 61 (2): 689-724.
  • 10梁启华,何晓红.空间集聚:隐性知识转移与共享机理与途径[J].管理世界,2006,22(3):146-147. 被引量:44

二级参考文献70

共引文献262

同被引文献209

引证文献13

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部