3P Skaane,A Skjennald.Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomised trial in a population-based screening program—Oslo II study. Radiology . 2004
4Lafontan BD,Daures JP,Salicru B,et al.Isolated clustered microcalcifications: Diagnostic value of mammography-series of 400 cases with surgical verification. Radiology . 1994
5Skaane P,Young K,Skjennald A.Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-Oslo I study. Radiology . 2003
6Fischmann A,Siegmann KC,Wersebe A,et al.Comparison of full-fielddigital mammography and film-screen mammography:image quality andlesion detection. British Journal of Radiology . 2005
4Elvecrog E L,Lechner N C.Nonpalpeble breast lesions;correlation of sterotaxic large-bore needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results[J].Radiology,1993,188:453
2Tozaki M. Interpretation of Breast MRI: Correlation of kinetic and morphological parameters with pathological fingdings[J]. Magn Reson in Medi Sci,2004;3(4) :189-197.
3Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging Part I, Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice [J]. Radiology, 2007 ;244:356-378.
4Buadu L D, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions : correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis [ J]. Radiology, 1996 ;200( 3 ) :639.
5Furman-Haran E, Schechtman E, Kelcz F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional diversity of the vascluatuer in benign and malignant berast lesions [J]. Cancer, 2005 ;104(4) :708 -718.
6Kurtz JM, Kinkel. Breast conservation in the art [ J ]. Eur J Cancer,2000;36(4) :1919.
7Elizabeth A, Morris MD. Laura liberman MD. breast mri diagnosis and invention [ M ]. USA: Springer Science Business Media, Inc,2005:234-235.
8Schnall MD, Rosten S, Englander S, et al. Acombined ar- chitectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images[J]. Acad Radiol,2001 ;8(7) :591-597.
9Turnbull LW. Dynamic contrast- enhanced mri in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer [ J ]. NMR Biomed,2009 ;22( 1 ) :28-39.
10Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging;are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions [J]. Radiology, 1999 ;211 ( 1 ) : 101 -110.
