期刊文献+

测验项目编制与等值的一种有效策略——层面理论 被引量:8

A Facet Theory Approach to Item Equivalency and Item Generation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 回转翻译法关注的是“文字等价”,项目反应理论注重“统计指标等价”。层面理论项目等价注重项目的同一测量目标,即等值的项目应该在相同的条件下测试被试相同的反应。层面理论通过映射语句技术清晰地界定项目的测量目标,使得项目等值与项目编制更加科学。通过层面理论编制的项目维度结构更加清楚,测验的结构效度更有保证。将层面理论和心理计量学的其他方法结合起来,可以有效提高测验项目编制与等值的质量。 While the back-translation approach bases item equivalency on “literal equivalency”,and IRT approach bases item equivalency on “equivalency of statistical properties”,facet theory's notion of item equivalency can be stated as'equivalent items are those items that have the same measurement intention'.Here the intention refers to “the researcher uses a specific item to know what or how the testee responses under the condition the item confines and towards the facet the item aims at.“Facet theory specifies an item's measurement intention with its special mapping sentence technique.Thus,facet theory can take a positive way both in item equivalency and item generation.It creates items instead of translating or screening items.Items written under framework of facet theory have clear multidimensional constructs,which helps to ensure content validity.It can be expected that it will improve the application of measurement if combining facet theory with other psychometric methods.
出处 《考试研究》 2007年第2期62-70,共9页 Examinations Research
基金 贵州师范大学博士基金资助。
关键词 项目等值 层面理论 项目编制 映射语句 结构效度 item equivalency facet theory item generation mapping sentence construct validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献33

  • 1边玉芳.警惕心理学研究中的统计误用[J].心理科学进展,2002,10(4):447-452. 被引量:11
  • 2骆文淑,赵守盈.多维尺度法及其在心理学领域中的应用[J].中国考试,2005(4):27-30. 被引量:41
  • 3安妮·安娜斯塔西 苏珊娜·厄比纳.心理测验[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1998.159-160.
  • 4Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Kao CF.The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition Journal of Personality Assessment 1984, 48 (3): 306-307.
  • 5Cacioppo JT, Petty RE.The Need For Cognition Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42 (1):116-131.
  • 6Koch C, Hayworth E.Examining the Relationship Between Need for Cognition and the Muller-Lyer Illusion North American Journal of Psychology, 2003, 5 (2): 249-256.
  • 7Gulgoz S. Need for Cognition and Cognitive Performance From a Cross-Cultural Perspective: Examples of Academic Success and Solving Anagrams The Journal of Psychology, 2001, 135(1): 100-112.
  • 8Cacioppo Jr, Petty RE, Feinstein .IA, et al. Dispositional Differences in Cognitive Motivation: The Life and Times of Individuals Varying in Need for Cognition Psychological Bulletin, 1996, 119 (2): 197-253.
  • 9Areni CS, Ferrell ME,Wilcox JB. The Persuasive Impact of Reported Group Opinions on Individuals Low vs High in Need for Cognition: Rationalization vs Biased Elaboration? Psychology & Marketing, 2000, 17 (10): 855-862.
  • 10Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V, et al. Individual Differences in Intuitive-Experiential and Analytical-Rational Thinking Styles Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71 (2): 390-405.

共引文献75

同被引文献45

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部