期刊文献+

以多面Rasch模型测量写作能力 被引量:1

The Measurement of Writing Ability with a Many-Faceted Rasch Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究的目的是描述一个用于测量写作能力的多面Rasch(FACETS)模型。该FACETS模型是Rasch测量模型的多元变量拓展,它可为写作测评中的校标评分员和写作题目提供框架。本文展示了如何应用FACETS模型解决大型写作测评中遇到的测量问题。参加全州写作考试的1000个随机抽取的学生样本被用来显示该FACETS模型。数据表明即使经过强化训练,评分员的严格度有显著区别。同时,本研究还发现,写作题目难度的区分,虽然微小,却具有统计意义上的显著性。该FACETS模型为解决以作文测评写作能力的大型考试遇到的测量问题提供了一个有前景的途径。 The purpose of this study is to describe a Many-Faceted Rasch(FACETS) model for the measurement of writing ability.The FACETS model is a multivariate extension of Rasch measurement models that can be used to provide a framework for calibrating both raters and writing tasks within the context of writing assessment.The use of the FACETS model for solving measurement problems encountered in the large-scale assessment of writing ability is presented here.A random sample of 1,000 students from a statewide assessment of writing ability is used to illustrate the FACETS model.The data suggest that there are significant differences in rater severity,even after extensive training.Small,but statistically significant,differences in writing task difficulty were also found.The FACETS model offers a promising approach for addressing measurement problems encountered in the large-scale assessment of writing ability through written compositions.
出处 《教育与考试》 2007年第4期72-79,共8页 Education and Examinations
关键词 大型写作能力测评 FACETS模型 分数评级调整 large-scale assessment of writing ability,FACETS,adjustments of ratings
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1Geoff N. Masters.A rasch model for partial credit scoring[J]. Psychometrika . 1982 (2)
  • 2Applied Measurement in Education . 1992
  • 3Afflerbach,P.The statewide assessment of writ-ing. . 1985
  • 4Applebee,A.N,Langer,J.A,&Mullis,I.Writing:Trends across the decade,1974-1984. . 1985
  • 5Applebee,A.N,Langer,J.A,Jenkins,L.B,Mullis,I,&Foertsch,M.A.Learning to write in our nation‘s schools:Instruction and achievement in1988at grades4,8and12. . 1990
  • 6The IEA study of written composition I:Writing tasksand scoring scales. . 1988
  • 7Cooper,C.R.Holistic evaluation of writing. Evaluating writing:Describing,measuring,judging . 1977
  • 8Lloyd-Jones,R.Primary trait scoring. Evaluating writing:Describing,mea-suring,judging . 1977
  • 9Wright,B.D,&Masters,G.N.Rating scale analysis:Rasch measurement. . 1982
  • 10Pollitt,A,Hutchinson,C.Calibrating graded assessments;Rasch partial credit analysisof performance in writ-ing. Language Testing . 1987

同被引文献13

  • 1Atta Gebril.Bringing reading-to-write and writing-only assessment tasks together: A generalizability analysis[J].Assessing Writing.2010(2)
  • 2Jinyan Huang.How accurate are ESL students’ holistic writing scores on large-scale assessments?—A generalizability theory approach[J].Assessing Writing.2008(3)
  • 3Yong-Won Lee,Robert Kantor.Evaluating Prototype Tasks and Alternative Rating Schemes for a New ESL Writing Test through G-theory[J].International Journal of Testing.2007(4)
  • 4Youyan Nie,Shu Mei Yeo,Shun Lau.APPLICATION OF GENERALIZABILITY THEORY IN THE INVESTIGATION OF THE QUALITY OF JOURNAL WRITING IN MATHEMATICS[J].Studies in Educational Evaluation.2006(3)
  • 5Robert L. Johnson,James Penny,Belita Gordon,Steven R. Shumate,Steven P. Fisher.Resolving Score Differences in the Rating of Writing Samples: Does Discussion Improve the Accuracy of Scores?[J].Language Assessment Quarterly.2005(2)
  • 6Richard R Sudweeks,Suzanne Reeve,William S. Bradshaw.A comparison of generalizability theory and many-facet Rasch measurement in an analysis of college sophomore writing[J].Assessing Writing.2004(3)
  • 7Xiaohong Gao,Robert L. Brennan.Variability of Estimated Variance Components and Related Statistics in a Performance Assessment[J].Applied Measurement in Education.2001(2)
  • 8姚琴宜,祁宗海,席仲恩.作文整体评分与分项评分结果的质量比对[J].外语研究,2008,25(5):66-71. 被引量:11
  • 9李智.英语作文分项评分的多元概化理论分析[J].湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版),2009,34(2):127-130. 被引量:2
  • 10刘远我,张厚粲.概化理论在作文评分中的应用研究[J].心理学报,1998,30(2):211-218. 被引量:54

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部