期刊文献+

压力舱土体改良对盾构开挖面稳定影响研究 被引量:6

Soil conditioning influence on face stability of shield tunnel
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在渗透性大且富含地下水的砂砾地层中进行土压平衡式盾构施工,切削下来的土体具有渗透系数大、流动性差的特点,由于地下水的渗透使压力舱内支护土压力不能有效地施加到开挖面。通过压力舱土体改良技术,降低土体渗透性和提高土体的流动性是改善压力舱土体状态和提高支护土压力的重要措施。利用能够考虑大变形破坏的快速拉格朗日有限差分计算程序研究了压力舱土体改良效果对开挖面稳定性的影响,分析了压力舱土体渗透系数的降低对开挖面支护压力的影响关系,为土压平衡式盾构施工开挖面支护压力的确定提供参考。 EPBM excavates in gravel stratum,whose ground water level is high. The soil excavated in chamber has big permeability coefficients,and is poor in flow ability. It is difficult to apply the support earth pressure to the working face due to the permeation of groundwater. Soil conditioning is a way of adjusting the soil condition in pressure chamber and increasing support earth pressure,which can decrease the permeability and increase the flow ability. The three-dimensional fast Lagrangian differential finite element method which can reflect the large strain of material is utilized to study the contribution of soil conditioning to face stability. The relationship between soil permeability decreasing and support pressures is analyzed. Some results from simulation are given for controlling face pressure.
出处 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第S1期516-520,共5页 Rock and Soil Mechanics
基金 浙江省科技厅重点项目(No.2006F12026)。
关键词 土体改良 开挖面稳定 支护压力 土压平衡式盾构 渗透系数 soil conditioning face stability support pressure earth pressure balanced shield permeability coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1[1]Kazuhito Komiya,Kenichi Soga,Hirokazu Akagi,Toshiyuki Hagiwara ,Malcolm D Bolton.Finite element modelling of excavation and advancement process of a shield tunneling machine[J].Soils and Foundations.1999,39,(3): 37-52.
  • 2[2]Lin D G,Tseng C T,Phienwej N,Suwansawat S.3-D deformation analysis of earth pressure balance shield tunnelling in Bangkok subsoil[J].Journal of the southeast asian geotechnical society ,2002,13-27.
  • 3[4]Lee K M,Rowe R K.Finite element modeling of the three dimensional ground deformations due to tunneling in soft cohesive soils: Part II-Results[J].Computers and Geotechnics,1990,2(2): 111-138.
  • 4[5]Lee K M,Rowe R K,Lo KY.Subsid otunnelling.I.Estimating the gap parameter[J].Canadian Geo technical Journal,1992,29 : 929-940.
  • 5[6]Lee K M,Rowe R K,Lo K Y.Subsidence owing to unnelling (Ⅱ): Evaluztionof a prediction technique[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1992,29:941-953.
  • 6[7]Lee K M.,Rowe R K.Finite element modeling of the three dimensional ground deformations due to tunneling in soft cohesive soils: Part I-Methods of analysis[J].Computers and Geotechnics,1990,2(2): 87-110.
  • 7[9]Mana A I ,Clough G W.Predicition of movements for braced cuts in clay[J].Journal of Geo technical Engineering Division ,1981 ,107 : 759-778.
  • 8Itasca Consulting Group Inc. FLAC3D:Fast lagrangain analysis of continua in 3 dimensions -theory and background[M]. 2002.
  • 9Peck R B. Deep excavations and tunneling in sof ground[A]. 7th Int Conf SMFE[C]. Mexico City, 1996, 225–290.
  • 10Mair R J, Taylor R N. Theme lecture: Bored tunnelling in the urban environment[J]. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,1997, 2353–2385.

共引文献224

同被引文献44

引证文献6

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部