摘要
芝加哥学派的经济分析方法给反垄断执法带来了革命性的变革,但其"唯效率论"的主张不仅在理论上难以自圆其说,在实践中也面临很多挑战。本文通过对实质公平在反托拉斯法价值体系中地位的历史变迁的考察,提出在现代反垄断法中,实质公平可以填补配置效率价值功能的不足,配置效率辅之以实质公平,可以保证在两价值目标的互动与适当张力中实现市场机制和政府规制、经济目标和社会目标的平衡与和谐发展。
The economic analysis methodology adopted by the Chicago School has brought a revolutionary transformation to the legal enforcement of the anti-trust law,however,the assertion of 'effectiveness priority'can not justify itself in theory and in the meanwhile meet much challenge in practice.Based on historically exploring the status of the substantive fairness in the value systems of anti-trust law,this Paper holds that in the modern anti-trust law,substantive fairness can act as the supplementary value of distribution effectiveness value,and through the interaction and appropriate tension control,both of the values can guarantee the balanced and harmonious development of market system and governmental regulation,economic objective and social objective.
出处
《北方法学》
2007年第4期90-96,共7页
Northern Legal Science
关键词
实质公平
配置效率
法律价值
substantive fairness
distribution effectiveness
value of law