期刊文献+

学术传承·学术创新·学术道德

Academic Heritage,Academic Innovation and Academic Moral
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不重视学术史概述是学术论文中存在的普遍现象。本文通过统计、调查访谈,剖析其原因,并认为,不论何种原因,忽视论文中的学术史概述,实际上是中断了学术传承,不仅难以证明论文的原创性和学术价值,影响高档次学术期刊的刊用,而且违背学术规范和学术道德。 Neglect of general introduction to academic history is a common phenomenon existing in academic papers.Through statistics data explanation and survey interviews,this article analyzes the reasons behind this phenomenon.The writer believes that this misconduct in academic papers terminates the academic heritage.Furthermore,the papers’ originality and academic value are hard to be identified.This not only affects the papers being accepted by high level academic journals,but also is in violation of academic norm and academic moral.
作者 汝炳荣
出处 《广东培正学院学报》 2007年第3期79-84,共6页 Journal of Guangdong Peizheng College
关键词 学术史概述 学术传承 学术创新 学术道德 Literature Review Academic Heritage Academic Innovation Academic Moral
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1][12]Mertens, D.M. Research Methods in Education and Psychology:Integrating Diversity with Quantitavive & Qualitative Approaches[M],London: Sage, 1997
  • 2[2][7]Silverman, D. Doing Qualitative Research. A Practical Handbook[M], London: Sage, 2000
  • 3[4]Babbie, E. The Practice ofSocial Rescarch (3d ed.)[M], Belmont, CA:Wadsworth, 1983
  • 4[5]LeCompte, M.D. and Preissle, J. Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Rescarch [M], San Diego: Academic Press, 1993
  • 5[9][13]Glaser, B. and Strauss, A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory:Strategies for Qualitative Rescarch[M], Chicago: Aldine, 1967
  • 6[10][14]Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. Research Methods in Education[M], London: Routledge, 2000

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部