期刊文献+

《理查三世》中历史的文本性 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 从新历史主义批评的视角,对莎士比亚的历史剧《理查三世》所塑造的人物形象理查三世予以史料文本和戏剧文本两种形式的对比解读,从而探讨该剧历史的文本性中历史与文本的互相依存和互为文本的关系。
作者 宁平
出处 《英语研究》 2005年第3期15-17,共3页 English Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1林庆新.历史叙事与修辞——论海登·怀特的话语转义学[J].国外文学,2003(4):3-10. 被引量:15
  • 2(英)威廉·莎士比亚(Shakespeare)著,杨林贵注释.理查三世[M]. 商务印书馆, 1997
  • 3Montrose Louis A.Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture[].The New Historicism.1989
  • 4Keith Dockray.William Shakespeare the Wars of The Roses and the Historians[]..2002
  • 5Keith Dockray.William Shakespeare the Wars of The Roses and the Historians[]..2002
  • 6Keith Dockray.William Shakespeare the Wars of The Roses and the Historians[]..2002

二级参考文献14

  • 1[12]Hayden White, Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism(Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1978), p.233,pp. 126 - 7.
  • 2关于福柯对"考古学"方法的讨论,参见The Order ofThings :An Archaeology of Human Sciences (New York: Vintage Books, 1994), pp. xxii-xxiii; The Archaeology of Knowledge ( London: Tavistock Publications Limited, 1972), pp. 167 - 77 .关于福柯为何使用"考古学"这个术语,参见Foucault Live ( New York: Semiotext ( e), 1989), pp. 57 - 8.
  • 3[10]Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Scieaces ( New York: Vintage Books, 1994), p. xxii, p. xiv.
  • 4Hayden White,"Foucault Decoded:Notes from Underground" in Tropics of Discourse, pp. 230 - 260.
  • 5[6][16][18][19][20]Hayden White, Figural Realism: Studies in the Mimesis Effect ( Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1999),p.21,p.9,pp.7 - 8,pp.51 - 2,p.22,p.9.
  • 6[8][14]Hayden White, Metahistory : The Historical Imagination in the Nineteenth Century Europe ( Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1973), p. 34, pp. 34 - 7,p.6.
  • 7怀特在《元历史》中声称该书是对"历史想象的深层结构的分析."见ix页;2页.
  • 8Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences ( New York: Vintage Books, 1994), p. xiv.
  • 9[22][23]Hayden White, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore & London, The Johns Hopkins UP, 1987), p. 28, p. ix, p. xi.
  • 10关于年代纪、编年史和历史的区别,见Hayden White, "The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality" in The Content of the Form, pp. 1 - 25 .

共引文献14

同被引文献12

  • 1赵一凡、张中栽、李德恩:《西方文论关键词》,北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2011年版,第670-681页.
  • 2Sacci,Peter. "Shakespeare' s English Kings." New York: Oxford University Press, 1977,P: 13. (7).
  • 3Mordss Henry, Partee. "Innocence and Evil in Richard IIL " Detroit Crale Research, 2006. Vol. 114 of ShalCriticism_ P':278-80.
  • 4More,Thomas. "The History of King Richard the Third." Richard III.Ed.Cartelli Thomas.New York:Norton & Company,2009,P: 117-118.
  • 5[英]莎士比亚:《理查三世》,《莎士比亚全集》(第三卷),孙法理译,南京:译林出版社,2014年版,第294、296、334、338页.
  • 6Watson Donald G.." Shakcspca~' s EaSy History Plays: Poliiics at Play onihc Elizabctb~ Stagc."Dcir Gale Research, 1990. VoL 123 of Shakespem Cdficism P:306-315.
  • 7McAlindon, Tom. "Testing the New Historicism: 'Invisible Bullets' RecomideretL" North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, 1995. Vol. 92 of Studies in Philology.P:411-438.
  • 8Mitchell, Charles." 'Tis a Vde Thing to Die' : Shakespeare' s Death Row in Richard III." Detroit: Gale Research, 2004. Vol. 114 of Shakespearen Criticism.P:252.
  • 9敬南非:《强化颠覆抑制协合:(应许之地)的文化诗学阐释》,《外国文学与文论研究》,2013年第6期,第123页.
  • 10Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespeare Negotiations. California:University ofCalifonia Press,1988,P:40.

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部