摘要
通过对比双线法压缩试验得出的经验公式和规范中给出的湿陷系数的计算式,得出了二者的计算结果完全一致,但经验公式在计算程序上化繁为简,节省了时间,使工作效率明显提高的结论。
Through comparing empirical formula obtained from double line method compression test with collapsibility coefficient calculation formula given from standard, it concluded that the calculation results were uniform, while empirical calculation formula was simpler in calculation procedure, which saved time and made working efficiency enhanced obviously.
出处
《山西建筑》
2009年第12期90-91,共2页
Shanxi Architecture
关键词
双线法
压缩试验
浸水饱和
湿陷系数
湿陷性起始压力
double line method, compression test, immersion saturation, collapsibility coefficient, collapsible starting pressure
