契约责任与侵权责任竞合的立法思考

Legislative Thoughts on the Concurrence between Contractual and Tortious Liability

《合同法》第122条给予了受损害方要求违约方承担契约责任或侵权责任的自主选择余地,是我国民事立法的重大突破。但是,当两个请求权所指向的利益可以独立并存时,该法条规制乏力,有明显缺陷,应予以修补。应当既承认受损害方的诉讼选择权。

Article 122 in contract law allows the victim the right of alternative plea between requesting the injuring party to be responsible for breach or infringement when these two contend each other.This is a great breakthrough in our chinese civil legislation.Whereas,When the two pleading rights point to interest which are exist separately for each other,article 122 cannot work well,and need amendment due to its flaws,we should recognize the right of choice for victim to sue,and protect the interest of victim in both aspects.