摘要
本文通过分析庄子哲学中道、技、言三者之间的关系,以及柏拉图哲学中相应的三个概念--理念世界(即绝对真实),对理念世界的第一重模仿(工匠的制作),对理念世界的第二重模仿(诗人的创作)--之间的关系,比较其异同,得出以下结论:庄子和柏拉图都认为技术高于语言,语言不能企及真理;然而柏拉图认为语言的表现对象是技艺世界,庄子则认为语言和技艺一样直接指向真理。两者对语言指向的不同认识影响了东西方文学对抒情和叙事的不同偏重。
this article analyzes the three elements' relationship - Dao, Ji, Van in Zhuang Zi's philosophy, and also the three concepts' relationship in Plato's philosophy - idea world ( absolute truth ), first imitation to the idea world ( craftsman's production ), and second imitation to the idea world ( poets' creation ). Based on the comparison on the above two philosophies, the article concludes that both Zhuang Zi and Plato agreed techniques is superior to language, and language can never reach the realm of truth, but Plato thought the techniques world is the object of language expression, while Zhuang Zi thought both language and techniques directly signify the truth in much the same way. Their different understanding to the language's signification lead to a different bias in literature emotion expression and narration in the east and west.
关键词
道
技术
语言
理念
模仿
Dao techniques language idea imitation
