摘要
The purpose of this paper is to explore the significance of Chinese invaded cities in the urban planning history through a comparative view of the modern urban planning theories and methodologies of Qingdao (Tsingtau) and those of the developed world from the late 19th century to mid 20th century. After reviewing the German Plan in 1898～1906 and the Japanese Plan in 1941, the paper concludes that the basis grounds of the urban planning practices in Qingdao between 1897～1945 were of the realistic physical planning, rather than of the commonly assumed utopian garden city. Therefore, Qingdao, once being a modern planning lab objectively, helped forward the theories and methodologies of the world′s modern urban planning between the late 19th century and mid 20th century.
通过将青岛的近、现代城市规划实践与当时（１９世纪末至２０世纪上半叶）发达国家的城市规划理论与技术进行比较研究，揭示了中国近、现代侵入型城市在城市规划史中的地位与价值．本文在回顾了１８９８～１９０６年的德占期间两个青岛的城市规划方案后提出，青岛在１８９７～１９４５年期间的规划实践的显著特征与其说是乌托邦式的花园城市思想，不如说是现实主义物质规划方法；同时青岛的近、现代城市规划实践在客观上推动了近、现代城市规划的发展，是检验现代城市规划理论与方法的早期实践之一．
