摘要
作为规范描述的意义理论希求在自由的主题下通过对概念的技术操作以及自由世界基本秩序的原则设计和拟定把世界分划为学科式科学的专门课题—客体,但是,把概念的逻辑限定贯穿到思想的涌动之中难道是合理的吗?在商业化的时代背景下,商品对世界历史的命名活动乃是从商品自身的合用性、实效性所制造的由资本的逻辑展开的身份增殖的虚像所推动的虚假需求和意象消费那里建构起来的。可是,用商品来注疏世界历史也是合法的么?这里的追问和运思试图表明,今天市场上流行的依靠计算理性来证明神性的技术在救渡人成为自由人的过程中酿就的无思状态只是在制造异化的遮蔽。
Meaning theory as the standard description aims to define the world as specialized disciplinary issues, or objects, by means of technical manipulation of concepts and principle designing in the basic order of the world, yet is it rational to have the logical definition in the dynamic meditation? Against commercialization, the function of commodities to the world is the utility and practicality of the commodities themselves as weU as the fietitious demand and image consumption promoted by the false identity reproduction rooted in the capital logic. Is it also rational to interpret the world history through commodities? The above questions are to clarify whether it is an alienated disguise to argue, relying on calculating reasoning, that the power of technology produces the thoughtless state in the process of man becoming free man.
出处
《常熟理工学院学报》
2009年第3期10-14,共5页
Journal of Changshu Institute of Technology
关键词
意义
语言
自由
工具理性
共在
在场
significance
language
freedom
instrumental rationality
co-existence
presence