摘要
目的比较痰热清治疗婴幼儿毛细支气管炎两种不同用药方式的临床效果。方法对120例婴幼儿毛细支气管炎随机分为静脉给药组和雾化吸入组,观察呼吸困难持续时间、肺部啰音消失时间、住院天数、不良反应等临床指标,综合判断疗效。结果静脉给药组呼吸困难持续时间(3.23±0.86)d,肺部啰音消失时间(5.12±1.33)d,住院天数(8.81±1.42)d,不良反应19例;雾化吸入组呼吸困难持续时间(2.67±0.69)d,肺部啰音消失时间(4.63±1.12)d,住院天数(7.45±1.17)d,不良反应5例。经统计学分析,P值均<0.05,组间差异有显著性。结论痰热清治疗婴幼儿支气管炎雾化吸入疗效优于静脉给药。
Objective To Compare the clinical effect on infants with bronchiotitis treated by Tangreqing injection in two different ways. Methods 120 eases of infants with bronchiolitis were randomly divided into groups of intravenous drug delivery and inhalation group,to observe clinical indicators,such as the duration of dyspnea, the duration of rales,length of hospital stay,adverse reactions,and determine the effect. Results The results of intravenous drug elivery group,the duration of breath (3.23 ±0.86)d,the duration of rales (5.12± 1.33 )d ,length of hospital stay (8.81 ± 1.42)d, adverse events 19 cases;Accordingly for another group,(2.67 ±0.69)d,(4.63 ± 1.12)d, (7.45 ± 1.17)d,5 cases. After statistical analysls,the differences between two groups were significant. Conclusion Inhalation drug delivery for in infants with bronchitis is more effective than intravenous drug delivery.
出处
《中国现代医生》
2009年第10期34-35,共2页
China Modern Doctor
关键词
痰热清
毛细支气管炎
疗效
Tangreqing injection
Bronchiolitis
Effects